So you can make sweeping generalizations about white people as a rhetorical tool based on statistical trends, but when someone else uses statistics to suggest things about nonwhite people they’re being foolish?
No, what you said was that he can’t really be Anglo, because he would be left-wing if he was. Hypothetically, how would you feel if a poster here said “I’m Jewish,” and someone responded with “I don’t believe you’re Jewish, because if you were you’d be left wing”? The statistics support that assumption at least as much as they support yours.
So the political alignment of a group of people historically is destiny, but then just above you say that Trump is gaining ground with minority groups who have for modern history been basically pure Left voting.
You are in such a rush to call people retarded and argue you aren't even holding a consistent stance. You are better than that.
I may disagree with a lot of his views and beliefs, but I know he is capable of arguing them better than this. Instead of just blindly screaming like a nigger at any possible thing he can grab.
So the political alignment of a group of people historically is destiny
Nope, I never said that. You're inventing an argument for me in order to claim I'm not giving you a good enough argument.
The point with the Anglos is that they are one of the only White Ethnicities he's not only gained the least ground with, but is also the group he lost ground with in 2020, and still doesn't have a majority on. I never said, "The Anglos are an inherently Leftist race incapable of voting right wing", so stop pretending I did. I said I think he's just saying he's Anglo to be disagreeable because he needs a rationalization to deport people who's families have lived in the country since before it's founding, as if there's any legitimate claim to deport such a population.
It's pretty normal for people to tell me shit that's obviously false.
You invented a position for him, from just the label of "founding stock" and then got mad at him for daring to disagree with you. So once again, hypocrisy or projection is at play.
You have no consistency here. You are just yelling wildly to always be in disagreement with people and are happy to contradict yourself if it means being opposition to them. You are better than that, and we both know it.
It's pretty normal for people to tell me shit that's obviously false.
I'M THE MAIN CHARACTER I'M THE MAIN CHARACTER
Explains a lot about why you say things like "I feel the need to say something so you don't get away with saying it unopposed" if this is the kind of self centered ego you have.
I’m founding stock and I agree
Doubtful. Considering the political alignment of most of the settler Anglos like Angela Davis and Elizabeth Warren, you'd be voting Harris.
Anglos are the White demographic Trump has had the most difficulty with.
So you can make sweeping generalizations about white people as a rhetorical tool based on statistical trends, but when someone else uses statistics to suggest things about nonwhite people they’re being foolish?
He said deportations must happen to people who's family lineage is older than his.
I said Anglos tend to be Leftwing.
I don't see the comparison, because I'm not calling for the mass deportation of the anglos.
At no point did anyone but you bring up how long people have been around.
Above he said they must all be deported because he likely thinks they aren't compatible with a civilized society.
No part of it has to do with age, tenure, seniority, or anything like that.
No, what you said was that he can’t really be Anglo, because he would be left-wing if he was. Hypothetically, how would you feel if a poster here said “I’m Jewish,” and someone responded with “I don’t believe you’re Jewish, because if you were you’d be left wing”? The statistics support that assumption at least as much as they support yours.
So the political alignment of a group of people historically is destiny, but then just above you say that Trump is gaining ground with minority groups who have for modern history been basically pure Left voting.
You are in such a rush to call people retarded and argue you aren't even holding a consistent stance. You are better than that.
He's really not.
I may disagree with a lot of his views and beliefs, but I know he is capable of arguing them better than this. Instead of just blindly screaming like a nigger at any possible thing he can grab.
He used to be though.
Last few years broke some people.
Nope, I never said that. You're inventing an argument for me in order to claim I'm not giving you a good enough argument.
The point with the Anglos is that they are one of the only White Ethnicities he's not only gained the least ground with, but is also the group he lost ground with in 2020, and still doesn't have a majority on. I never said, "The Anglos are an inherently Leftist race incapable of voting right wing", so stop pretending I did. I said I think he's just saying he's Anglo to be disagreeable because he needs a rationalization to deport people who's families have lived in the country since before it's founding, as if there's any legitimate claim to deport such a population.
It's pretty normal for people to tell me shit that's obviously false.
You invented a position for him, from just the label of "founding stock" and then got mad at him for daring to disagree with you. So once again, hypocrisy or projection is at play.
You have no consistency here. You are just yelling wildly to always be in disagreement with people and are happy to contradict yourself if it means being opposition to them. You are better than that, and we both know it.
Explains a lot about why you say things like "I feel the need to say something so you don't get away with saying it unopposed" if this is the kind of self centered ego you have.
Get over yourself hombre.
This is retarded, even by your standards.
Also, so ethnicity does play a part in things like political alignment now? That opens up some questions, doesn't it?
It's the Gizortnik Political Uncertainty Principle. The political leaning of an actor is unknown until he decides what it is.
They're self-reported political alignment within their self-reported ethnicity, within their answers on survey polling.
You really don't understand that information can come outside of raw assumptions about genetics, don't you?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: I don't see anything in this statement that meets that.