So you can make sweeping generalizations about white people as a rhetorical tool based on statistical trends, but when someone else uses statistics to suggest things about nonwhite people they’re being foolish?
No but it does. You don't deport indigenous populations, you'd just be replacing them. I'm saying they have more of a right to be here than he does, assuming he's even American.
No, what you said was that he can’t really be Anglo, because he would be left-wing if he was. Hypothetically, how would you feel if a poster here said “I’m Jewish,” and someone responded with “I don’t believe you’re Jewish, because if you were you’d be left wing”? The statistics support that assumption at least as much as they support yours.
You're a liar. I said he probably isn't Anglo, not that he can't be.
I get called a dirty fucking kike that should kill myself literally every day because I point out double minus wrong-think like: Scott Adams isn't a White Nationalist.
So, I'd consider it par for the course, given the number of those people who are saying that are Qatari shills and Feds.
None the less, I doubt he's Anglo because most Anglos aren't White Nationalists, and he's probably just saying that to win an argument on the internet, like a lot of people.
So the political alignment of a group of people historically is destiny, but then just above you say that Trump is gaining ground with minority groups who have for modern history been basically pure Left voting.
You are in such a rush to call people retarded and argue you aren't even holding a consistent stance. You are better than that.
I may disagree with a lot of his views and beliefs, but I know he is capable of arguing them better than this. Instead of just blindly screaming like a nigger at any possible thing he can grab.
He's only capable of that when he's got an easily defensible position. When he knows he's wrong but can't talk his way out of it, that's when he chimps out.
So the political alignment of a group of people historically is destiny
Nope, I never said that. You're inventing an argument for me in order to claim I'm not giving you a good enough argument.
The point with the Anglos is that they are one of the only White Ethnicities he's not only gained the least ground with, but is also the group he lost ground with in 2020, and still doesn't have a majority on. I never said, "The Anglos are an inherently Leftist race incapable of voting right wing", so stop pretending I did. I said I think he's just saying he's Anglo to be disagreeable because he needs a rationalization to deport people who's families have lived in the country since before it's founding, as if there's any legitimate claim to deport such a population.
It's pretty normal for people to tell me shit that's obviously false.
You invented a position for him, from just the label of "founding stock" and then got mad at him for daring to disagree with you. So once again, hypocrisy or projection is at play.
You have no consistency here. You are just yelling wildly to always be in disagreement with people and are happy to contradict yourself if it means being opposition to them. You are better than that, and we both know it.
It's pretty normal for people to tell me shit that's obviously false.
I'M THE MAIN CHARACTER I'M THE MAIN CHARACTER
Explains a lot about why you say things like "I feel the need to say something so you don't get away with saying it unopposed" if this is the kind of self centered ego you have.
I haven't been contradictory at all. You're assuming previous arguments, not made here, that you think I make; and saying I'm contradicting those. I'm not.
You're telling me that I am physically incapable of understanding that a category tends to have a political alignment, then you see me pointing out that a category has a political alignment, and then you tell me I'm a hypocrite.
That's not hypocrisy. You're just wrong about me.
I'M THE MAIN CHARACTER
You're inventing more arguments. When someone is talking to me, that is my personal knowledge. I didn't say I'm the sole human here. It's not uncommon for people here to tell me that I say things that I don't say, believe things that I don't believe, and am things that I am not; all because it comports to what they want me to say, think, and be.
Doubtful. Considering the political alignment of most of the settler Anglos like Angela Davis and Elizabeth Warren, you'd be voting Harris.
Anglos are the White demographic Trump has had the most difficulty with.
So you can make sweeping generalizations about white people as a rhetorical tool based on statistical trends, but when someone else uses statistics to suggest things about nonwhite people they’re being foolish?
He said deportations must happen to people who's family lineage is older than his.
I said Anglos tend to be Leftwing.
I don't see the comparison, because I'm not calling for the mass deportation of the anglos.
At no point did anyone but you bring up how long people have been around.
Above he said they must all be deported because he likely thinks they aren't compatible with a civilized society.
No part of it has to do with age, tenure, seniority, or anything like that.
No but it does. You don't deport indigenous populations, you'd just be replacing them. I'm saying they have more of a right to be here than he does, assuming he's even American.
No, what you said was that he can’t really be Anglo, because he would be left-wing if he was. Hypothetically, how would you feel if a poster here said “I’m Jewish,” and someone responded with “I don’t believe you’re Jewish, because if you were you’d be left wing”? The statistics support that assumption at least as much as they support yours.
Well, this is Giz. He
thinksclaims you can't be a leftist and a Jew simultaneously.You're a liar. I said he probably isn't Anglo, not that he can't be.
I get called a dirty fucking kike that should kill myself literally every day because I point out double minus wrong-think like: Scott Adams isn't a White Nationalist.
So, I'd consider it par for the course, given the number of those people who are saying that are Qatari shills and Feds.
None the less, I doubt he's Anglo because most Anglos aren't White Nationalists, and he's probably just saying that to win an argument on the internet, like a lot of people.
So the political alignment of a group of people historically is destiny, but then just above you say that Trump is gaining ground with minority groups who have for modern history been basically pure Left voting.
You are in such a rush to call people retarded and argue you aren't even holding a consistent stance. You are better than that.
He's really not.
I may disagree with a lot of his views and beliefs, but I know he is capable of arguing them better than this. Instead of just blindly screaming like a nigger at any possible thing he can grab.
He's only capable of that when he's got an easily defensible position. When he knows he's wrong but can't talk his way out of it, that's when he chimps out.
Race seems to be a gigantic blind spot for him.
He used to be though.
Last few years broke some people.
Nope, I never said that. You're inventing an argument for me in order to claim I'm not giving you a good enough argument.
The point with the Anglos is that they are one of the only White Ethnicities he's not only gained the least ground with, but is also the group he lost ground with in 2020, and still doesn't have a majority on. I never said, "The Anglos are an inherently Leftist race incapable of voting right wing", so stop pretending I did. I said I think he's just saying he's Anglo to be disagreeable because he needs a rationalization to deport people who's families have lived in the country since before it's founding, as if there's any legitimate claim to deport such a population.
It's pretty normal for people to tell me shit that's obviously false.
You invented a position for him, from just the label of "founding stock" and then got mad at him for daring to disagree with you. So once again, hypocrisy or projection is at play.
You have no consistency here. You are just yelling wildly to always be in disagreement with people and are happy to contradict yourself if it means being opposition to them. You are better than that, and we both know it.
Explains a lot about why you say things like "I feel the need to say something so you don't get away with saying it unopposed" if this is the kind of self centered ego you have.
Get over yourself hombre.
I haven't been contradictory at all. You're assuming previous arguments, not made here, that you think I make; and saying I'm contradicting those. I'm not.
You're telling me that I am physically incapable of understanding that a category tends to have a political alignment, then you see me pointing out that a category has a political alignment, and then you tell me I'm a hypocrite.
That's not hypocrisy. You're just wrong about me.
You're inventing more arguments. When someone is talking to me, that is my personal knowledge. I didn't say I'm the sole human here. It's not uncommon for people here to tell me that I say things that I don't say, believe things that I don't believe, and am things that I am not; all because it comports to what they want me to say, think, and be.
This is retarded, even by your standards.
Also, so ethnicity does play a part in things like political alignment now? That opens up some questions, doesn't it?
It's the Gizortnik Political Uncertainty Principle. The political leaning of an actor is unknown until he decides what it is.
They're self-reported political alignment within their self-reported ethnicity, within their answers on survey polling.
You really don't understand that information can come outside of raw assumptions about genetics, don't you?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: I don't see anything in this statement that meets that.