The more I look at events, the more I think the steal WON'T be for the presidency and they are focusing more on Senate and House races to sacrifice Kamala instead.
Interesting. What makes you think that? I think the House is more likely since if they're shameless enough to steal the Senate given GOP friendly map they're surely shameless enough to steal the presidency.
When you see how much funds they put into stopping people like Brandon Herrera or Kari Lake winning their races, but the bone headed moves to 'help' Kamala, it seems like they want the attention she gives by being a retard to be a smokescreen as they make sure they have enough assets in government everywhere else.
It's simply not believable for Kamala to win and they don't want a hot civil war, which they nearly had with a more believable steal.
And they don't have to.
Trump is still a puppet, but instead of a marionette with strings he's a bull chasing red. They'd much rather have a marionette, but the bull isn't escaping their ring (mostly impeachment, D house/senate, threatening the family, etc).
Like I doubt we find out about JFK or Epstein because they'll make some offer to Trump like helping him deport illegals or save the economy. If we do get an Epstein client list it'll be like a matador being gored - happens sometimes, but the bullfighting continues with a new bull and new matador.
I have fairly similar thoughts. They may not be able to stop Trump getting into office, but if they can take over Congress enough they might be able to remove him with bogus impeachment charges. It seems like a last hurrah since their previous lawfare wasn't working, and their assassins have been unlucky and incompetent so far.
Kamala is the perfect puppet for the left wing political machine. She is a hack who owes her entire career to others good graces. She knows that so she will just do what she is told. But you are right about the house and senate. They need that more. She will just rubber stamp anything progressive that comes along and she is too stupid to lead that’s why they need the lifelong grifters in the senate to have power.
Frankly, Bair interrupting her could have given her the boss girl moment she wanted... but she's too stupid and emotionally unhinged to understand how to handle it.
Everything out of her staff says she's an entitled prick who really does boss people around, is occasionally drunk, and screams at people.
There's something very "equitable" about calling a woman a prick. Sure bitch and cunt are the obvious choice but the attitude is prickish. So she receives no special treatment she is just a plain old prick.
I think it's actually important to recognize that a woman is engaging in pathological masculine behaviors.
It's a way of saying: "That's unmanly" and "That's not ladylike" in modern speak because those phrases have been attacked to the point where standing against them is somehow a good thing.
Not only are you acting like an asshole, you are acting like an asshole of the opposite sex, which shows just how fucked up you are.
Really, the same thing is happening when you call a man "a bitch".
She's a 'girl boss' in name only, and even that's a weak sticker over the puppet she is.
It's why she got destroyed in 2020 in one response and why hopefully she's going to lose again.
She's definitely going to lose again. The only question is if she's going to be able to pull off the steal.
The more I look at events, the more I think the steal WON'T be for the presidency and they are focusing more on Senate and House races to sacrifice Kamala instead.
Interesting. What makes you think that? I think the House is more likely since if they're shameless enough to steal the Senate given GOP friendly map they're surely shameless enough to steal the presidency.
When you see how much funds they put into stopping people like Brandon Herrera or Kari Lake winning their races, but the bone headed moves to 'help' Kamala, it seems like they want the attention she gives by being a retard to be a smokescreen as they make sure they have enough assets in government everywhere else.
It's simply not believable for Kamala to win and they don't want a hot civil war, which they nearly had with a more believable steal.
And they don't have to.
Trump is still a puppet, but instead of a marionette with strings he's a bull chasing red. They'd much rather have a marionette, but the bull isn't escaping their ring (mostly impeachment, D house/senate, threatening the family, etc).
Like I doubt we find out about JFK or Epstein because they'll make some offer to Trump like helping him deport illegals or save the economy. If we do get an Epstein client list it'll be like a matador being gored - happens sometimes, but the bullfighting continues with a new bull and new matador.
I have fairly similar thoughts. They may not be able to stop Trump getting into office, but if they can take over Congress enough they might be able to remove him with bogus impeachment charges. It seems like a last hurrah since their previous lawfare wasn't working, and their assassins have been unlucky and incompetent so far.
Kamala is the perfect puppet for the left wing political machine. She is a hack who owes her entire career to others good graces. She knows that so she will just do what she is told. But you are right about the house and senate. They need that more. She will just rubber stamp anything progressive that comes along and she is too stupid to lead that’s why they need the lifelong grifters in the senate to have power.
They will let Trump have it. Then start a war with Iran.
Frankly, Bair interrupting her could have given her the boss girl moment she wanted... but she's too stupid and emotionally unhinged to understand how to handle it.
Everything out of her staff says she's an entitled prick who really does boss people around, is occasionally drunk, and screams at people.
There's something very "equitable" about calling a woman a prick. Sure bitch and cunt are the obvious choice but the attitude is prickish. So she receives no special treatment she is just a plain old prick.
I think it's actually important to recognize that a woman is engaging in pathological masculine behaviors.
It's a way of saying: "That's unmanly" and "That's not ladylike" in modern speak because those phrases have been attacked to the point where standing against them is somehow a good thing.
Not only are you acting like an asshole, you are acting like an asshole of the opposite sex, which shows just how fucked up you are.
Really, the same thing is happening when you call a man "a bitch".