This is step one of normalizing the war with Iran. It is not a "IDGAF" argument in any way.
We can pretend this isn't slippery slope but everyone around here should theoretically be familiar with how the slippery slope works and be smart enough to game out what step 2 is from this argument.
"israel" cannot win a war with all Muslim countries on its own, and they will drag you into it to die on their behalf.
It literally is. You can say he's lying to your face if you want, but the entire premise of his argument is "They're savages 10,000+km away, IDGAF".
The idea that every slope inevitably reaches only one, specific far-removed conclusion is just as dumb as the idea that one specific conclusion could never happen just because it is far-removed from the current context. Absolute slippery slope reductions are for dumb people, whichever way you point the slide.
You can just as well eat popcorn as the middle east turns itself into the a primary rubble producer and say "nah, fuck Israel too" when they get in over their heads, in fact that sounds ideal.
Yeah, but that doesn't matter. You have to understand it's always the jews at fault. No matter what. Ignore Mohammed raping your wife and kids, the jews are behind it and it's not his fault.
Oh fuck off the Muslims aren't good little boys framed by the Jews. Did the CIA start in the 8th century training the caliphates? Were Mossad behind the second sacking of Constantinople? Islam has had plenty of rope with which to hang it's reputation and they tied that knot tight.
Even in modern day I've met plenty of those impotent genocidal shits. And I know they aren't IDF funded, because if they had that Jew gold they wouldn't be living in their own filth as listless welfare parasites.
Okay cool. If we are going to lower our brain power to that level, then all Christians are to blame for Russia attacking Ukraine. Because the Russians are Christians, and all people are just giant monoliths.
Which is the logical conclusion of YOUR rationale. Just thought I'd spell that out since you're obviously going to think that I am actually making that argument, given the level of reasoning that you are demonstrating.
I hate the Ottomans as much as the next guy, but what you just said is idiotic.
As for what you "have seen and noted", I am just going to have to press a X for a big doubt.
Wait, so are Muslims a homogeneous monolithic good boy sect who are 100% peaceful and those genocidal jihadis are just propaganda?
Or are they a beautiful rainbow of diverse individuals who cannot be generalized about and that definitely don't have a disproportionate number of genocidal maniacs even though conquering and slaughtering non-believers is a fundamental tennet?
You can't have it both ways, you already lowered the IQ of the convo with your first reply, I just kept it simple so you didn't have to sweat too much to keep up.
The part where they would genocide everyone else if they could. Did he fucking stutter?
And he's not even saying it's ok to genocide them, he's just saying it's ok to not give a fuck that someone else is.
This is step one of normalizing the war with Iran. It is not a "IDGAF" argument in any way.
We can pretend this isn't slippery slope but everyone around here should theoretically be familiar with how the slippery slope works and be smart enough to game out what step 2 is from this argument.
"israel" cannot win a war with all Muslim countries on its own, and they will drag you into it to die on their behalf.
Never forget 9/11.
It literally is. You can say he's lying to your face if you want, but the entire premise of his argument is "They're savages 10,000+km away, IDGAF".
The idea that every slope inevitably reaches only one, specific far-removed conclusion is just as dumb as the idea that one specific conclusion could never happen just because it is far-removed from the current context. Absolute slippery slope reductions are for dumb people, whichever way you point the slide.
You can just as well eat popcorn as the middle east turns itself into the a primary rubble producer and say "nah, fuck Israel too" when they get in over their heads, in fact that sounds ideal.
When glowie Bin Laden 2.0 does his totally organic terrorist attack he won't be 10k + km away.
Yeah, but that doesn't matter. You have to understand it's always the jews at fault. No matter what. Ignore Mohammed raping your wife and kids, the jews are behind it and it's not his fault.
Or something.
That sounds like a "them" problem. Don't start fights you have no hope of winning.
Good riddance to Iran, too
Cool, so the part invented by your own propaganda. The terrorists that believe that shit were funded, trained, and armed by the CIA and Mossad.
And it's not "someone else" when every bomb and bullet is built in your country in a war funded by your government.
Oh fuck off the Muslims aren't good little boys framed by the Jews. Did the CIA start in the 8th century training the caliphates? Were Mossad behind the second sacking of Constantinople? Islam has had plenty of rope with which to hang it's reputation and they tied that knot tight.
Even in modern day I've met plenty of those impotent genocidal shits. And I know they aren't IDF funded, because if they had that Jew gold they wouldn't be living in their own filth as listless welfare parasites.
Okay cool. If we are going to lower our brain power to that level, then all Christians are to blame for Russia attacking Ukraine. Because the Russians are Christians, and all people are just giant monoliths.
Which is the logical conclusion of YOUR rationale. Just thought I'd spell that out since you're obviously going to think that I am actually making that argument, given the level of reasoning that you are demonstrating.
I hate the Ottomans as much as the next guy, but what you just said is idiotic.
As for what you "have seen and noted", I am just going to have to press a X for a big doubt.
Wait, so are Muslims a homogeneous monolithic good boy sect who are 100% peaceful and those genocidal jihadis are just propaganda?
Or are they a beautiful rainbow of diverse individuals who cannot be generalized about and that definitely don't have a disproportionate number of genocidal maniacs even though conquering and slaughtering non-believers is a fundamental tennet?
You can't have it both ways, you already lowered the IQ of the convo with your first reply, I just kept it simple so you didn't have to sweat too much to keep up.