Okay cool. If we are going to lower our brain power to that level, then all Christians are to blame for Russia attacking Ukraine. Because the Russians are Christians, and all people are just giant monoliths.
Which is the logical conclusion of YOUR rationale. Just thought I'd spell that out since you're obviously going to think that I am actually making that argument, given the level of reasoning that you are demonstrating.
I hate the Ottomans as much as the next guy, but what you just said is idiotic.
As for what you "have seen and noted", I am just going to have to press a X for a big doubt.
Wait, so are Muslims a homogeneous monolithic good boy sect who are 100% peaceful and those genocidal jihadis are just propaganda?
Or are they a beautiful rainbow of diverse individuals who cannot be generalized about and that definitely don't have a disproportionate number of genocidal maniacs even though conquering and slaughtering non-believers is a fundamental tennet?
You can't have it both ways, you already lowered the IQ of the convo with your first reply, I just kept it simple so you didn't have to sweat too much to keep up.
Except I did not make a general statement about all Muslims. I made a statement about terrorists who believe that shit. But given your demonstrations, I am not surprised your reading comprehension is also low. You're not just wrong, you're also bad at this.
In effect you did generalize about all Muslims, all the bad ones are CIA fakes, ergo all the real Muslims are good. You took Muslims as a whole, split them up into two groups and made an absurd generalization about one group with the implied exclusion of the other (Unless you wanna say the CIA and Mossad are also funding and training all peaceful good boys too? "All of Islam is a sham front for Zionists" is a wild new defence tactic I've not seen before, so go ahead, it'll be funny). You don't literally have to say "all Muslims" before it becomes a generalization, there's some advanced reading comprehension for you.
I also dislike the weasely introduction of the qualifier "terrorists" that only you brought in, to try and minimize the size of the group you're claiming are false flags. You can't just pretend nobody holds those beliefs until they successfully blow something up, those willing to blow themselves up even though they have no chance of winning are only the most extreme tip of the iceberg of those who would be ok with genocide. Again I've met plenty who openly approve of genocide but haven't done shit, yet, they wont act until they at least think they have the upper hand.
Okay cool. If we are going to lower our brain power to that level, then all Christians are to blame for Russia attacking Ukraine. Because the Russians are Christians, and all people are just giant monoliths.
Which is the logical conclusion of YOUR rationale. Just thought I'd spell that out since you're obviously going to think that I am actually making that argument, given the level of reasoning that you are demonstrating.
I hate the Ottomans as much as the next guy, but what you just said is idiotic.
As for what you "have seen and noted", I am just going to have to press a X for a big doubt.
Wait, so are Muslims a homogeneous monolithic good boy sect who are 100% peaceful and those genocidal jihadis are just propaganda?
Or are they a beautiful rainbow of diverse individuals who cannot be generalized about and that definitely don't have a disproportionate number of genocidal maniacs even though conquering and slaughtering non-believers is a fundamental tennet?
You can't have it both ways, you already lowered the IQ of the convo with your first reply, I just kept it simple so you didn't have to sweat too much to keep up.
Except I did not make a general statement about all Muslims. I made a statement about terrorists who believe that shit. But given your demonstrations, I am not surprised your reading comprehension is also low. You're not just wrong, you're also bad at this.
In effect you did generalize about all Muslims, all the bad ones are CIA fakes, ergo all the real Muslims are good. You took Muslims as a whole, split them up into two groups and made an absurd generalization about one group with the implied exclusion of the other (Unless you wanna say the CIA and Mossad are also funding and training all peaceful good boys too? "All of Islam is a sham front for Zionists" is a wild new defence tactic I've not seen before, so go ahead, it'll be funny). You don't literally have to say "all Muslims" before it becomes a generalization, there's some advanced reading comprehension for you.
I also dislike the weasely introduction of the qualifier "terrorists" that only you brought in, to try and minimize the size of the group you're claiming are false flags. You can't just pretend nobody holds those beliefs until they successfully blow something up, those willing to blow themselves up even though they have no chance of winning are only the most extreme tip of the iceberg of those who would be ok with genocide. Again I've met plenty who openly approve of genocide but haven't done shit, yet, they wont act until they at least think they have the upper hand.