Typical Hollywood bullshit. It's the same shit we saw in GamerGate. Elites in the industry protecting corruption with cronyism.
Also, I know OP's being a faggot, but let's not reduce Harvey Weinstien to "a jew". Not only is it retarded jew-hatred, but it's also an insult to what Miyazaki actually did, since he stood up to one of the most powerful, corrupt, an influential sex traffickers in Hollywood.
Typical Hollywood bullshit. It's the same shit we saw in GamerGate. Elites in the industry protecting corruption with cronyism.
One reason your posts aren't as compelling as the J narrative you despise is that you lather up clear details with words like "cronyism" that don't improve anyone's understanding of the issue. Where is the cronyism here? Alpert isn't Weinstein's employee and there's no mention of kickbacks or other bribes. Also, Weinstein's predilection for cutting movies is dumb, but from what I can tell there's no corrupt ulterior motive. It's a creative industry and people have strange ideas about what sells. The only gift in this story is from... Miyazaki.
One might argue that only a corrupt industry replete with favoritism and blackmail would allow someone like Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense? No, I don't think so.
Yes, it's cronyism, because all corruption requires cronyism. As a tyrant, you require loyalty among your subordinates and surrogates. That requires glad-handing, bribes, influence-peddling, and providing your subordinates and surrogates with things they are otherwise not merited to achieve on their own. This isn't new, this exists, this has been the case in all societies that have ever experienced corruption.
Harvey Weinstein is so well known for corruption and influence peddling it's not denied, and we have the recordings of him trying to pressure women to have sex with him, and we have plenty of women themselves explicitly stating that you can't be popular in Hollywood unless you sleep with him.
But, you've now demanded that I prove that this, and only this, specific request to cut a single movie from Miyazaki was corrupt in anyway, otherwise my claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt people in Hollywood is false.
But then you accept that he is the powerful and corrupt:
Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
Ah yes, because only jews are biologically capable of corruption? Oh wait, that doesn't make any sense, and your assertion is beyond asinine. It can't possibly be that corrupt people build networks of corruption to protect their power, it can only be racialism that preforms any corrupt act.
You ask me to prove that corruption exists at all within my claim, and then press the counter-claim that an entire race, through all time and space, is capable only of corruption, and your claim is so patently self-evident it requires no proof whatsoever.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense?
No, it's just that some Jews are Jewish supremacist assholes. Such as the ones who run an industry based almost entirely on nepotism and child trafficking that overwhelmingly hires other Jews who may or may not also be Jewish supremacists.
Typical Hollywood bullshit. It's the same shit we saw in GamerGate. Elites in the industry protecting corruption with cronyism.
Also, I know OP's being a faggot, but let's not reduce Harvey Weinstien to "a jew". Not only is it retarded jew-hatred, but it's also an insult to what Miyazaki actually did, since he stood up to one of the most powerful, corrupt, an influential sex traffickers in Hollywood.
One reason your posts aren't as compelling as the J narrative you despise is that you lather up clear details with words like "cronyism" that don't improve anyone's understanding of the issue. Where is the cronyism here? Alpert isn't Weinstein's employee and there's no mention of kickbacks or other bribes. Also, Weinstein's predilection for cutting movies is dumb, but from what I can tell there's no corrupt ulterior motive. It's a creative industry and people have strange ideas about what sells. The only gift in this story is from... Miyazaki.
One might argue that only a corrupt industry replete with favoritism and blackmail would allow someone like Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense? No, I don't think so.
Yes, it's cronyism, because all corruption requires cronyism. As a tyrant, you require loyalty among your subordinates and surrogates. That requires glad-handing, bribes, influence-peddling, and providing your subordinates and surrogates with things they are otherwise not merited to achieve on their own. This isn't new, this exists, this has been the case in all societies that have ever experienced corruption.
Harvey Weinstein is so well known for corruption and influence peddling it's not denied, and we have the recordings of him trying to pressure women to have sex with him, and we have plenty of women themselves explicitly stating that you can't be popular in Hollywood unless you sleep with him.
But, you've now demanded that I prove that this, and only this, specific request to cut a single movie from Miyazaki was corrupt in anyway, otherwise my claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt people in Hollywood is false.
But then you accept that he is the powerful and corrupt:
Ah yes, because only jews are biologically capable of corruption? Oh wait, that doesn't make any sense, and your assertion is beyond asinine. It can't possibly be that corrupt people build networks of corruption to protect their power, it can only be racialism that preforms any corrupt act.
You ask me to prove that corruption exists at all within my claim, and then press the counter-claim that an entire race, through all time and space, is capable only of corruption, and your claim is so patently self-evident it requires no proof whatsoever.
Take your bad faith sophistry somewhere else.
No, it's just that some Jews are Jewish supremacist assholes. Such as the ones who run an industry based almost entirely on nepotism and child trafficking that overwhelmingly hires other Jews who may or may not also be Jewish supremacists.
And usually the likes of Gizortnik will say they only run industries like that because of high IQs.
Really? Fantasict, then perhaps a bit of nuance wouldn't hurt.