Arrogance of the Press (Published 1973)
article by W Loeb, publisher of Manchester Union Leader, holds Pres Nixon should not now resign or be impeached because to do so would take control of US away from voters and give it to small group of 'arrogant self-apptd rulers' in form of radio and TV co...
Watergate was a deep state op, from beginning to end, and Nixon fell for it.
Sadly (or fortunately depending on how you look at it) even years later he never even realized the full extent of it, at least according to Geoff Shepard in his recent Tucker interview. https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1821593377164419377
Nixon suspected there were deep state elements trying to seize power from American voters for years, but he was never shown the whole picture - how everything about the op including the orchestrated media coverage was a setup assisted by his political opposition.
Ill watch that later. Figures Tucker would be the person to have that guy on, he really is on a slow motion red pill.
Commies have always been faggot liars.
Wow - the Times was based once?!
No, they just didn't purge all of the people who didn't understand the objective of the New York Times was to promote Communism.
Previous generations of Leftists were much more intelligent than the current average. You've got to understand that some of the smartest western Leftists of our time are Tony Blair and Barrack Obama, which is really saying just how dumb they've gotten.
They used to understand that through literally Fabian tactics, you subverted the current system and brought it under Socialist control without ever even calling it Socialism. Socialism was already a dirty word because revolutionary Leftists had failed so many times, and killed so many people in the US.
Every once in a while, the revolutionaries would go on a tear, and the Fabians around them had to repeatedly explain the concept of subtlety. This is aptly shown in the Struggle Session of Albert Multz, a Socialist hollywood writer, who tried to explain to the Communists why propaganda needed to be subtle and not obtrusive.
See "The Gray Lady Winked"](https://www.amazon.co.uk/Gray-Lady-Winked-Misreporting-Fabrications-ebook/dp/B0922WP4VQ) to see that they were always ideologically captured by one Socialist variant or another
They never opposed these things from any moral framework, they opposed them because they weren't benefitting.
Wonder what the context was back then that would have the NYT publish a conservative article (paid ad?) criticizing it.