We can't have debates anymore because everything has become a virtue signal. Even in niche little shitholes like this, that have zero value, people are obsessed with making sure you know how much they hate the Jews (to use one example, it fits with any label really) and how every thing in existence is Jews.
No questions, no thinking. Just waiting for the next guy to say "actually it was even more Woke than you just said!" as he quotes some random screenshot and then every claps like seals.
And if you point out their source is flawed and doesn't make sense they will flip shit and accuse you of defending women and being a simp and yadayada. Even if you agreed the idea seemed possible, but the source saying it wasn't trustworthy and likely just grifting. They don't want to engage with the idea, they just want to be applauded for saying Nigger the loudest. And they've wrapped their ego and self-worth in being the rebel who says it, which means you questioning them is an actual attack.
Even someone who is educated and capable of debate, like Gitzortnik, will simply start shouting "STORMFAG STORMFAG" at you for trying to engage him on the topic, because his ego is that wrapped in being "the voice of reason" here about it.
I'll respond to most anything, its how these long arguments usually end up happening.
But why have they gone that path?
Because its human to do so. Everyone wants to be the underdog, everyone wants to be special, and everyone wants to be right. It takes constant self reflection, self-forced humility, and a willingness to break rank regardless of embarrassment to stave off our own subconscious turning us into that.
Its even more rampant right now, because the cultural/political landscape is heavily team based. Us vs them. You can't have a nuanced or third position because that's just letting the Evil side get stronger through inaction. So everyone is pushing each other to the extremes to try and become the "overwhelming force" they think is necessary to defeat the other side.
You are probably correct in that gathering knowledge is discouraged, instead knowledge is just meant to be a bludgeon to prove how enlightened you are, and if you can be the one to say "ackshually Greece/Rome was super homophobic, you been psyopped into thinking otherwise" then you become the most "knowledgable" and thereby the winner.
Which means you must beat them over the head with knowledge and then discourage the information gathering phase in order to keep being the anointed one
You could also just overload them with information until they just cannot keep up with the constantly flowing happenings and then rewriting of those happenings.
Which seems to be how this is going. People don't have the time or energy to keep up in all the battlefields going on in this culture war, so they outsource the flow to who they consider "trustable" sources. And because the human mind loves consensus, "trustable" usually ends up as "says what I want to hear." Which then creates an echo chamber for yourself where you discount all information that doesn't fit as lies or psyops and overload yourself with confirmation bias. And then it just spirals from there until they feel strongly enough to be shouting down other people who try to dissent.
A new query becomes how do you end this war state of the mind?
I don't think we can truly. Humans will always create problems to overcome, its just in our nature. The best solution we have is to fractalize into tinier communities, where you have face to face interaction with all parties and the world is a lot smaller, thereby giving you full access to all information directly.
This isn't possible more than likely, and is probably communism in a way, so the best we can hope for is to mitigate the negative effects the best we can. What the best way to do that is, is hard to say.
I won't pretend to have all the answers, I'm just an aging coonass, but I at least try to avoid some of the common pitfalls to keep myself from falling into the same mindsets.
We can't have debates anymore because everything has become a virtue signal. Even in niche little shitholes like this, that have zero value, people are obsessed with making sure you know how much they hate the Jews (to use one example, it fits with any label really) and how every thing in existence is Jews.
No questions, no thinking. Just waiting for the next guy to say "actually it was even more Woke than you just said!" as he quotes some random screenshot and then every claps like seals.
And if you point out their source is flawed and doesn't make sense they will flip shit and accuse you of defending women and being a simp and yadayada. Even if you agreed the idea seemed possible, but the source saying it wasn't trustworthy and likely just grifting. They don't want to engage with the idea, they just want to be applauded for saying Nigger the loudest. And they've wrapped their ego and self-worth in being the rebel who says it, which means you questioning them is an actual attack.
Even someone who is educated and capable of debate, like Gitzortnik, will simply start shouting "STORMFAG STORMFAG" at you for trying to engage him on the topic, because his ego is that wrapped in being "the voice of reason" here about it.
I'll respond to most anything, its how these long arguments usually end up happening.
Because its human to do so. Everyone wants to be the underdog, everyone wants to be special, and everyone wants to be right. It takes constant self reflection, self-forced humility, and a willingness to break rank regardless of embarrassment to stave off our own subconscious turning us into that.
Its even more rampant right now, because the cultural/political landscape is heavily team based. Us vs them. You can't have a nuanced or third position because that's just letting the Evil side get stronger through inaction. So everyone is pushing each other to the extremes to try and become the "overwhelming force" they think is necessary to defeat the other side.
You are probably correct in that gathering knowledge is discouraged, instead knowledge is just meant to be a bludgeon to prove how enlightened you are, and if you can be the one to say "ackshually Greece/Rome was super homophobic, you been psyopped into thinking otherwise" then you become the most "knowledgable" and thereby the winner.
You could also just overload them with information until they just cannot keep up with the constantly flowing happenings and then rewriting of those happenings.
Which seems to be how this is going. People don't have the time or energy to keep up in all the battlefields going on in this culture war, so they outsource the flow to who they consider "trustable" sources. And because the human mind loves consensus, "trustable" usually ends up as "says what I want to hear." Which then creates an echo chamber for yourself where you discount all information that doesn't fit as lies or psyops and overload yourself with confirmation bias. And then it just spirals from there until they feel strongly enough to be shouting down other people who try to dissent.
I don't think we can truly. Humans will always create problems to overcome, its just in our nature. The best solution we have is to fractalize into tinier communities, where you have face to face interaction with all parties and the world is a lot smaller, thereby giving you full access to all information directly.
This isn't possible more than likely, and is probably communism in a way, so the best we can hope for is to mitigate the negative effects the best we can. What the best way to do that is, is hard to say.
I won't pretend to have all the answers, I'm just an aging coonass, but I at least try to avoid some of the common pitfalls to keep myself from falling into the same mindsets.