Do I think it's a trap? Yes it absolutely could be, you guys aren't paying attention to what I post because you're going full fanboi. Even if everything everyone is saying is true about the situation, at the end of the day, they took money from glowies and got greedy.
That's my problem with them, this is less to do with the DOJ supposedly entrapping them with a fake honeypot for me, it's more to do with the fact that they agreed to such a shady deal in the first place. I think as well people should also potentially take note of how all the other paranoid and likely slightly autistic youtubers who do talk about glowies all the time probably never even looked at that crap because it seemed shady.
You guys might find me annoying and retarded now but I promise you that none of them are going to come out of this looking good especially it turns out they were taking money from more than one government source. It's like with the whole Hawk Tuah girl being mysteriously astroturfed, it all fucking glows like Chernobyl and I've already done my ranting about red pill podcasters.
Here's to hoping it turns into nothing, I mean that sincerely, but eh, it's not going to be a good look for them if they're getting taken down.
you guys aren't paying attention to what I post because you're going full fanboi.
Literally no one is fanboying. Tim Pool, who most people here don't like, is probably the primary target. I already explained I don't even like most of the people involved.
Also, we're paying attention to what you're saying. You're just wrong.
...at the end of the day, they took money from glowies and got greedy.
Says fucking who? You're so off base it's just sad.
...the fact that they agreed to such a shady deal in the first place.
Again, says who? I don't even get where you're getting any of this, or why you're jumping to the absolutely worst conclusion, and giving the DOJ, leftist media, and leftist bots and shills the benefit of the doubt, and fully condemning the right wing independent creators.
It would be like if the UK government said Lotus Eaters were terrorists, the BBC ran with the story, and a bunch of bots were obviously weaponized to harass the Lotus Eaters. And I just said, "wow, really disappointed in the Lotus Eaters, how could they be so scummy?" I'd never do that though, because I'm not retarded.
You guys might find me annoying and retarded...
I don't usually mind you, but you're certainly being retarded on this issue, sadly.
...I promise you that none of them are going to come out of this looking good...
Yeah, because all of our enemies have decided to try to end them, because they were a threat, and are a useful tool to try to shout 'foreign interference.'
This will absolutely hurt their reputations...that's the whole point of the fucking attack.
it's not going to be a good look for them if they're getting taken down.
You edited that it, so I'll address that too. Holy shit, stop. If YouTube takes them down, it will make them look bad? YouTube is complicit. It's Google/Alphabet, who works with the government. Holy fuck, it's the whole point. To get rid of them. This isn't rocket science.
I'm not 'fully condemning' them, I think though they're not going to come out of this looking good if it turns out they did take money in any capacity from a government source. If they took money from a government source of any kind, they're not independent at all.
Do you get it yet? This is why I'm doubling down, it's a very simple point, it's like how you get organisations like PBS and the BBC pretending they're independent yet it's right their in the fine print that they take government money.
Knowingly 'taking money from a government source' would certainly be questionable. These youtubers took money from Tenet Media which (correct me if I'm wrong) isn't a government. If you're only saying it looks bad, then duh, it's been engineered to look bad by bad actors.
Only now has it been revealed that Tenet Media is Russian funded-- who knew what and when is a very valid question, but not what you're asking. You're rushing to judgement about the youtubers who were associated seemingly without asking what they knew about Tenet Media. You're blaming the patsies for the crime before the trial even begins.
If this was a government op to poison the well and tarnish moderate-right youtubers, then you've fallen for it.
Even if they're not officially with a government agency or organisation they still could be taking government money. I don't understand why people on this site are being such blatant fanbois over this particular issue when not five seconds ago they were attacking Dustborn devs for doing exactly the same thing.
. The DOJ could be being the DOJ and going after them over bullshit charges
. The youtubers in question could have taken money from suspicious sources they should have done due diligence on
Do I think it's a trap? Yes it absolutely could be, you guys aren't paying attention to what I post because you're going full fanboi. Even if everything everyone is saying is true about the situation, at the end of the day, they took money from glowies and got greedy.
That's my problem with them, this is less to do with the DOJ supposedly entrapping them with a fake honeypot for me, it's more to do with the fact that they agreed to such a shady deal in the first place. I think as well people should also potentially take note of how all the other paranoid and likely slightly autistic youtubers who do talk about glowies all the time probably never even looked at that crap because it seemed shady.
You guys might find me annoying and retarded now but I promise you that none of them are going to come out of this looking good especially it turns out they were taking money from more than one government source. It's like with the whole Hawk Tuah girl being mysteriously astroturfed, it all fucking glows like Chernobyl and I've already done my ranting about red pill podcasters.
Here's to hoping it turns into nothing, I mean that sincerely, but eh, it's not going to be a good look for them if they're getting taken down.
Literally no one is fanboying. Tim Pool, who most people here don't like, is probably the primary target. I already explained I don't even like most of the people involved.
Also, we're paying attention to what you're saying. You're just wrong.
Says fucking who? You're so off base it's just sad.
Again, says who? I don't even get where you're getting any of this, or why you're jumping to the absolutely worst conclusion, and giving the DOJ, leftist media, and leftist bots and shills the benefit of the doubt, and fully condemning the right wing independent creators.
It would be like if the UK government said Lotus Eaters were terrorists, the BBC ran with the story, and a bunch of bots were obviously weaponized to harass the Lotus Eaters. And I just said, "wow, really disappointed in the Lotus Eaters, how could they be so scummy?" I'd never do that though, because I'm not retarded.
I don't usually mind you, but you're certainly being retarded on this issue, sadly.
Yeah, because all of our enemies have decided to try to end them, because they were a threat, and are a useful tool to try to shout 'foreign interference.'
This will absolutely hurt their reputations...that's the whole point of the fucking attack.
You edited that it, so I'll address that too. Holy shit, stop. If YouTube takes them down, it will make them look bad? YouTube is complicit. It's Google/Alphabet, who works with the government. Holy fuck, it's the whole point. To get rid of them. This isn't rocket science.
Even the feds say the personalities didn't know where the money was coming from.
So, his take just keeps getting more braindead.
I'm not 'fully condemning' them, I think though they're not going to come out of this looking good if it turns out they did take money in any capacity from a government source. If they took money from a government source of any kind, they're not independent at all.
Do you get it yet? This is why I'm doubling down, it's a very simple point, it's like how you get organisations like PBS and the BBC pretending they're independent yet it's right their in the fine print that they take government money.
Knowingly 'taking money from a government source' would certainly be questionable. These youtubers took money from Tenet Media which (correct me if I'm wrong) isn't a government. If you're only saying it looks bad, then duh, it's been engineered to look bad by bad actors.
Only now has it been revealed that Tenet Media is Russian funded-- who knew what and when is a very valid question, but not what you're asking. You're rushing to judgement about the youtubers who were associated seemingly without asking what they knew about Tenet Media. You're blaming the patsies for the crime before the trial even begins.
If this was a government op to poison the well and tarnish moderate-right youtubers, then you've fallen for it.
Even if they're not officially with a government agency or organisation they still could be taking government money. I don't understand why people on this site are being such blatant fanbois over this particular issue when not five seconds ago they were attacking Dustborn devs for doing exactly the same thing.
. The DOJ could be being the DOJ and going after them over bullshit charges
. The youtubers in question could have taken money from suspicious sources they should have done due diligence on
Both points can be true