I term murder as you killing someone that made no effort to cause you or others harm directly and even indirectly (because I put no value in 'speech is violence' shit)
Self defence is not murder, someone tries to assault me or approaching me with a weapon but I have a gun, that's justified.
Self defense extends beyond immediate threat to life. A threat to the peace of mind in your home, a threat to the safety of a family member or person in a community (both physical as well as from a sexual predator), a threat to the well being of others are all a threat that is worth righteous anger and self defense.
This part I'm iffy on because the left are mentally ill and will use this as justification that the assassination attempt on Trump was self defence because he's literally Hitler like the media have been telling them.
We can't really use 'peace of mind' as justification when we have a mental health crisis currently, too many disturbed individuals.
Murder as a term can be as simple as killing another person. That's it. Some people, myself included, are autistic enough to go by those definitions and under certain conditions committing it would range from execution, to revenge, to threat control.
I know in religious circles people debate if the Commandment is "Thou shall not kill" or "Thou shall not commit murder."
The wording seems synonymous until you consider self-defense isn't considered murder. All of a sudden loop holes pop up allowing killing outside of murder.
It's murkier than that. There are some sects that won't kill mosquitos, because... "Thou SHALT NOT KILL", straight-up. Not "no killing your homies", not "no killing the humans", even, just "no kill" as an absolute: All are gods creations and to kill them is to desecrate god's works.
Meanwhile, the more militant Old Testament sects view it as "thou shalt not kill... humans who worship the same god as you in the specific same way as you that haven't broken any other rules of man or god, because after all, the bible's got the death penalty for basically everything, and we could use a bit more land, so that's all kosher".
There's a HUGE range in how such a simple rule is interpreted.
Murder can be forgivable depending on context.
I term murder as you killing someone that made no effort to cause you or others harm directly and even indirectly (because I put no value in 'speech is violence' shit)
Self defence is not murder, someone tries to assault me or approaching me with a weapon but I have a gun, that's justified.
Self defense extends beyond immediate threat to life. A threat to the peace of mind in your home, a threat to the safety of a family member or person in a community (both physical as well as from a sexual predator), a threat to the well being of others are all a threat that is worth righteous anger and self defense.
This part I'm iffy on because the left are mentally ill and will use this as justification that the assassination attempt on Trump was self defence because he's literally Hitler like the media have been telling them.
We can't really use 'peace of mind' as justification when we have a mental health crisis currently, too many disturbed individuals.
Murder as a term can be as simple as killing another person. That's it. Some people, myself included, are autistic enough to go by those definitions and under certain conditions committing it would range from execution, to revenge, to threat control.
Murder definition : Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention
Its a different definition from "killing" which just means "causing death"
I know in religious circles people debate if the Commandment is "Thou shall not kill" or "Thou shall not commit murder."
The wording seems synonymous until you consider self-defense isn't considered murder. All of a sudden loop holes pop up allowing killing outside of murder.
It's murkier than that. There are some sects that won't kill mosquitos, because... "Thou SHALT NOT KILL", straight-up. Not "no killing your homies", not "no killing the humans", even, just "no kill" as an absolute: All are gods creations and to kill them is to desecrate god's works.
Meanwhile, the more militant Old Testament sects view it as "thou shalt not kill... humans who worship the same god as you in the specific same way as you that haven't broken any other rules of man or god, because after all, the bible's got the death penalty for basically everything, and we could use a bit more land, so that's all kosher".
There's a HUGE range in how such a simple rule is interpreted.