Based Korean man
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
What qualifies as a "mass scale"? When does the importation of immigrants go from good to too much? I need a defined set not up to the Federal Government's discretion.
Dropping a single Mexican family in a small town can forever change that town's demographics within a few generations because of the speed of their breeding. Heck you don't even need the family, just one of their women could do it with a little time. For a race purist her very existence will now One Drop Rule that town into being non-white eventually on its own.
This isn't some "based" guy saying the truth. Its massive compromise to not sound "extreme" or "racist" by dancing around the issue with saying its okay kinda sometimes but this particular (vague and undefined) way is bad.
Sane and reasonable policies that exist prior are no longer viable because the things that made them work (lack of technology, shared culture, uncrossable lines) are gone. We can't baby step back into them by being "based" and dunking on people online.
At best we can overshoot and then scale back from there, which requires being willing to say things that will get you cancelled and called a bigot/evil/whatever. Including not playing "one of the good ones" with minorities like this Korean here.
OK, let's do the math. If a family of five Mexican kids each has 5 kids per generation in the same town for 2 generations that's only 125 grandchildren, all quarter Mexican, which isn't even noticeable depending on the white admixture of the original couple. Even in a small town of 5k that's not crazy.
If it's 3 generations that's 625 great-grandchildren, which sounds significant except they're all 1/8 Mexican and 7/8 white. This is why historical intermarriage with American Indians is treated as a joke, why natives are so insecure about being eroded (basically correct, coupled with their dysgenic culture), and why mass migration is wielded as a demographic weapon, not quota migration.
The one drop rule is a meaningless concept that would disqualify the majority of hard right activists off the bat.
And that's 625 people who still have a cultural background that is completely different than the rest of their town, one they probably feel more strongly about pushing because its different than the norm of the white one.
I used the example because it literally happened in my own town. One single family was hyperbolic on my part (and bad math so you got me on that), but they brought in like 4-5 to rebuild after Katrina and and in a single generation since the area they live in and its school is a completely shifted place unlike anything around it. And of course once they were "established" all their extended family came to, which made the number of them explode.
And its already happening with now restaurants and signs nearby adding Spanish to it, which we all know how that progresses.
Being disqualified has never stopped anyone from screaming about it. People still take Nick Fuentes seriously and he is probably the living example of it. And most people here would not stop for a moment in attacking someone if their great great grandmother was Jewish.
Either way, that was just a poorly exaggerated example I made too late into the night to think through, the rest of the point still stands.
4-5 families arriving at once with extended relatives (as Mexicans tend to carry) is like 60+ people who will probably interbreed over mixing, thereby putting up to 100+ fullblooded and halfblooded Mexican kids in the local school in just one generation, so no kidding it changed the entire area. The enclave is self-sustaining at that point, no real need to mix.
Proportionately, that's like importing whole percentage points of the national population, as is the case now. Your town was effectively subject to mass migration.
Fair enough, I'm not sure which way you're going on this though. I think you're pointing out the absurdity of it.
The arrival was a handful of dudes, with the wives/kids arriving months later (this was all spoken about in the local news because of its uniqueness and worries about issues with the Haitians). The extended family was years later, because hurricanes mean Mexican laborers have huge amounts of work. But because they were family they were both able to easily enter and then stay permanently.
Point being that a very minuscule amount of people is still enough to have notable effects, especially, as is always the case, when they refuse to assimilate and instead retain their own culture. And that the post's insistence on it only being "mass" paints a very different picture than reality in which a tiny number is still enough to effect.
If we go with the full 60 people, it was less than 0.05% of my town's population. A rounding error of a number that wouldn't even phase most people still could have a noticeable effect on local populations.
And the point about Race Purity was pointing out absurdity of how/when its applied, yes.
You say that and yet there were STILL so called "conservative Christians" whining about this milk toast comment made by this Korean guy because it was still "too racist" for them. And they have the mindset that "we should accept anyone who is Christian". That's the problem with "Christian nationalists"