Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8-FgrJ0J-o
In the cartoon a dog is dancing to some music. Woke faggot comes up to him, turns off his music and starts screaming. The dog turns the music again (he just wants to be left alone). After a while, the wokie smashes the dog's radio.
Instead of the dog tearing out his neck, he just gets sad and starts crying. Until, his friend brings another radio to play music.
The video ends there but if there was a next scene, it'd just the wokie smashing the second radio and the dogs going to walmart to get a new radio (to be smashed).
Ignoring certain people doesn't work.
Yes.
If one group is actively being genocided, let's use the extreme example of jews being rounded up and sent on trains to camps or getting executed in the streets, isn't any action taken against the people committing that act and preventing the methods used defensive in nature? Sabotaging railways, etc.
Or are you going to be a "compromise your way onto train cars" kind of person?
Sabotaging railways is wildly different than anything that's been brought up so far. It's significantly more mild.
Any action is not justified. No excuse justifies any response. Same reason that even if someone is firing a gun at you from a nearby street corner, you can't throw a grenade at the street corner and kill a dozen innocent people in defending yourself. So, do not feed me this ridiculous false dichotomy where I either support "genocide in self defense" or I'm "a pacifist that supports genocide over preserving my own life."
Sabotaging a railway is possibly as mild damaging signage. It could effectively be lowered to Civil Disobedience. What's being called for, and what I just had to ban someone for is mass murder in response to theoretically lowering the maximum quality of life achievable. That's literally the single most disproportionate response I can imagine.
Unless you're talking about intentionally causing a train derailment to kill everyone on the training and then people in a nearby village, it might not even be considered violence, let alone violent speech. And again, the mass killing of innocent civilians is not acceptable, nor is the support for it on this board.