Non-sequitor but I’m not one to dismiss possibilities out of hand.
On a related note, while watching the footage, I couldn’t help but notice the lady SS agent in the front kept ducking down while moving trump, leaving large parts of his face and chest exposed, in contrast to the male agents who were doing their best to cover him from all angles
Honestly, the reason why I humor you so much is because I think you get a lot right, up to a certain point where you draw a line in the sand and can’t imagine anything beyond it.
Yes, radical feminism has been used as a cudgel against western society/traditional values, but (prepare for the mindfuck): it isn’t women wielding that cudgel - it’s women being wielded, and more importantly that’s only one tool among many in the armament rack
That's just collateral damage. If you read feminist academia, their true and only goal is not to "stop oppression of women", but to eradicate men.
it isn’t women wielding that cudgel - it’s women being wielded, and more importantly that’s only one tool among many in the armament rack
What basis do you have for this? This narrative died after October 7th. Common sense says Jews would not prop up a movement that openly hates their religion, their nation and their people.
Every single fight we're in traces back to a feminist call.
Trans ideology was trumpeted by Solanas as the only way men could be allowed to exist - as facsimiles of women that serve women.
Race war is directly referenced in "Masculinities" by Raewyn Connell, where the author states that an anti-sexist movement must create division among men, not solidarity.
The collapse of the economy through hyper-inflation was also suggested by Solanas, who wanted to destroy the monetary system.
The wielder isn’t “Jews” either imp. They, like women, are among the wielded.
In the armament rack alongside Feminism are some related weapons, such as Zionism, Bolshevism, Globalism, Usury-Based Capitalism, Consumerism, Terrorism, Trust-the-Plan-ism, and so on
Non-sequitor but I’m not one to dismiss possibilities out of hand.
On a related note, while watching the footage, I couldn’t help but notice the lady SS agent in the front kept ducking down while moving trump, leaving large parts of his face and chest exposed, in contrast to the male agents who were doing their best to cover him from all angles
Valerie Solanas said to take control of the institutions and turn them against the "male oppressors".
It's past time for the threat to be taken seriously. Pretending Solanas was just a lunatic is helping nobody.
Honestly, the reason why I humor you so much is because I think you get a lot right, up to a certain point where you draw a line in the sand and can’t imagine anything beyond it.
Yes, radical feminism has been used as a cudgel against western society/traditional values, but (prepare for the mindfuck): it isn’t women wielding that cudgel - it’s women being wielded, and more importantly that’s only one tool among many in the armament rack
That's just collateral damage. If you read feminist academia, their true and only goal is not to "stop oppression of women", but to eradicate men.
What basis do you have for this? This narrative died after October 7th. Common sense says Jews would not prop up a movement that openly hates their religion, their nation and their people.
Every single fight we're in traces back to a feminist call.
Trans ideology was trumpeted by Solanas as the only way men could be allowed to exist - as facsimiles of women that serve women.
Race war is directly referenced in "Masculinities" by Raewyn Connell, where the author states that an anti-sexist movement must create division among men, not solidarity.
The collapse of the economy through hyper-inflation was also suggested by Solanas, who wanted to destroy the monetary system.
The wielder isn’t “Jews” either imp. They, like women, are among the wielded.
In the armament rack alongside Feminism are some related weapons, such as Zionism, Bolshevism, Globalism, Usury-Based Capitalism, Consumerism, Terrorism, Trust-the-Plan-ism, and so on