Dude, the swastikas are literally different, unless you're talking about the retard ones that are typically done with hate hoaxes.
And yes, the philosophical and political theories that form the basis for the narrative dialectic that Leftists operate on, is why they are doing the things they do.
Everyone else, ends up being a Useful Idiot that gets sacrificed at the alter to those very same people because of rhetorical warfare.
I can be sympathetic to coal miners during the Coal Wars, but I also know that communist agit-prop caused the Coal Wars in the first place, and even if people should have had better working conditions, the unions made sure that terrorism, violence, and harassment was the first policy; and weaponizing the resentment of Useful Idiots was the primary objective.
If you want to see men, women, children, and infants mass executed because you've accepted that an entire demographic of people are deontologically evil because of ConPro fags having a good meme game; the problem isn't jews, it's you.
Not about my conclusion, it's about your conclusion.
There is no way to reasonably conclude that one and only one demographic of people are deontologically evil and should be exterminated to the last octoon infant. You didn't reason your way into it, because you literally can't reason your way into it.
You didn't think about anything. You just accepted a narrative that was spoon-fed to you daily. That's really the only way you can even come to that conclusion. You can't come to that conclusion, even by terrible personal experiences. That level of universalism doesn't emerge from people's experiences or conduct. Experiences are far more varied than that. It emerges from ideology alone.
that one and only one demographic of people are deontologically evil
Bold of you to assume I think its only one group. The fact that you build your little soapbox on assumptions like that is truly pathetic, double so given we've had these discussions on plural other groups in the past. I'm a misogynist first, and everything else second.
But don't let pesky little facts like that stop you from writing your PSA. I'm sure this time it'll convince someone. Or are you still just doing it to stroke your own ego?
If you're ideologically captured, then it's easy to identify your positions without further input from you.
I'm not trying to convince you, because there's no point in trying. A fundamentally irrational position can't be argued down. I can't convince you not to kill jews in the same way I can't convince an incel not to hate women. There's no rational argument that will suffice. No evidence is sufficient to rebuke an unfalsifiable argument.
So, I'm not trying to change your irrational position. I'm just trying to make sure it's rejected by someone, because I don't like the idea that you can spout your stupid bullshit with no response. It's gatekeeping.
Dude, the swastikas are literally different, unless you're talking about the retard ones that are typically done with hate hoaxes.
And yes, the philosophical and political theories that form the basis for the narrative dialectic that Leftists operate on, is why they are doing the things they do.
Everyone else, ends up being a Useful Idiot that gets sacrificed at the alter to those very same people because of rhetorical warfare.
I can be sympathetic to coal miners during the Coal Wars, but I also know that communist agit-prop caused the Coal Wars in the first place, and even if people should have had better working conditions, the unions made sure that terrorism, violence, and harassment was the first policy; and weaponizing the resentment of Useful Idiots was the primary objective.
If you want to see men, women, children, and infants mass executed because you've accepted that an entire demographic of people are deontologically evil because of ConPro fags having a good meme game; the problem isn't jews, it's you.
Right right, the only way to ever possibly come to a conclusion that isn't yours is because by falling for memes.
After all, no one has their own thoughts (except you) and exist only in the exact theoretical frameworks you believe in.
Not about my conclusion, it's about your conclusion.
There is no way to reasonably conclude that one and only one demographic of people are deontologically evil and should be exterminated to the last octoon infant. You didn't reason your way into it, because you literally can't reason your way into it.
You didn't think about anything. You just accepted a narrative that was spoon-fed to you daily. That's really the only way you can even come to that conclusion. You can't come to that conclusion, even by terrible personal experiences. That level of universalism doesn't emerge from people's experiences or conduct. Experiences are far more varied than that. It emerges from ideology alone.
Bold of you to assume I think its only one group. The fact that you build your little soapbox on assumptions like that is truly pathetic, double so given we've had these discussions on plural other groups in the past. I'm a misogynist first, and everything else second.
But don't let pesky little facts like that stop you from writing your PSA. I'm sure this time it'll convince someone. Or are you still just doing it to stroke your own ego?
Does he do anything other than fellate himself?
If you're ideologically captured, then it's easy to identify your positions without further input from you.
I'm not trying to convince you, because there's no point in trying. A fundamentally irrational position can't be argued down. I can't convince you not to kill jews in the same way I can't convince an incel not to hate women. There's no rational argument that will suffice. No evidence is sufficient to rebuke an unfalsifiable argument.
So, I'm not trying to change your irrational position. I'm just trying to make sure it's rejected by someone, because I don't like the idea that you can spout your stupid bullshit with no response. It's gatekeeping.