If you're ideologically captured, then it's easy to identify your positions without further input from you.
I'm not trying to convince you, because there's no point in trying. A fundamentally irrational position can't be argued down. I can't convince you not to kill jews in the same way I can't convince an incel not to hate women. There's no rational argument that will suffice. No evidence is sufficient to rebuke an unfalsifiable argument.
So, I'm not trying to change your irrational position. I'm just trying to make sure it's rejected by someone, because I don't like the idea that you can spout your stupid bullshit with no response. It's gatekeeping.
Right, you are a super genius who just knows what everyone who opposes you is thinking and what their beliefs are. Because again, anyone who isn't you and doesn't agree with you can be whatever you need them to be.
So this is for feeding your own ego, I appreciate the confirmation.
And considering listening to your impotent little tirades has almost always left me feeling more secure in my, usually still forming, position (sans the illegals one recently, I'll grant you), you are the literal worst gatekeeper I've ever seen.
At least Antonio knew how to have fun when trying to do it. You should ask him for pointers.
You can project your nonsense onto me, all you like. I'm not having fun with you, I don't respect you. I don't care if you feel more secure, because you aren't going to listen one way or another. Feeling more secure in your own position is the only outcome for any conversation with you.
You're missing the point of your own capture. Replying is proof of a conspiracy to stop you from telling the truth of the narrative. Not replying is proof that there's no valid retort. The argument is unfalsifiable. There is no path where you don't claim it as evidence that you are correct. There is no way to convince you you're wrong. You have to choose to do that by rejecting the ideology, yourself, when you realize it does nothing for you. No one can do that for you.
If you're ideologically captured, then it's easy to identify your positions without further input from you.
I'm not trying to convince you, because there's no point in trying. A fundamentally irrational position can't be argued down. I can't convince you not to kill jews in the same way I can't convince an incel not to hate women. There's no rational argument that will suffice. No evidence is sufficient to rebuke an unfalsifiable argument.
So, I'm not trying to change your irrational position. I'm just trying to make sure it's rejected by someone, because I don't like the idea that you can spout your stupid bullshit with no response. It's gatekeeping.
Right, you are a super genius who just knows what everyone who opposes you is thinking and what their beliefs are. Because again, anyone who isn't you and doesn't agree with you can be whatever you need them to be.
So this is for feeding your own ego, I appreciate the confirmation.
And considering listening to your impotent little tirades has almost always left me feeling more secure in my, usually still forming, position (sans the illegals one recently, I'll grant you), you are the literal worst gatekeeper I've ever seen.
At least Antonio knew how to have fun when trying to do it. You should ask him for pointers.
You can project your nonsense onto me, all you like. I'm not having fun with you, I don't respect you. I don't care if you feel more secure, because you aren't going to listen one way or another. Feeling more secure in your own position is the only outcome for any conversation with you.
And yet you continue to respond. If I was so evil as you paint me, then what would knowingly pushing me further into extremism make you?
You just admitted you consider it gatekeeping to respond, but then follow it with admitting you know doing the opposite is the outcome of doing so.
I'm beginning to think you might be retarded, Mister.
Not evil; lost.
You're missing the point of your own capture. Replying is proof of a conspiracy to stop you from telling the truth of the narrative. Not replying is proof that there's no valid retort. The argument is unfalsifiable. There is no path where you don't claim it as evidence that you are correct. There is no way to convince you you're wrong. You have to choose to do that by rejecting the ideology, yourself, when you realize it does nothing for you. No one can do that for you.