The T's may be the most vocal and obnoxious problem in the alphabet soup, but as this story shows they're not the only problem. All flavors of pervert end up fucking kids.
Gays, both fag and lesbian, have been causing untold evil since before the Ts were even worth talking about. We have open secrets, historical documentation, and political parties entirely based on them doing it.
Vagina Monologues felt comfortable talking about corrective rape to turn straight underaged girls into lesbians in the 90s, meaning it was a thing bigger than just the grooming of "political lesbianism" prior. NAMBLA was a founding member in many Gay Organizations for decades and operated openly with child rape being their founding goal.
None of these things were "controversial" until years later when the non-gays noticed and questioned how fucked up it was, which then just buried it.
Victims of abuse perpetrating that abuse. You cannot tell me you become a gay porn star without having some major childhood trauma. This is how they procreate. You are absolutely correct about the non T's in the alphabet soup are a problem too and it's sad it isn't talked about. Remember "we'll convert your children"? Yea..
Out of all the alphabet soup, the ones probably safer with kids is the Bi's, why? Because they CAN be part of a normal family structure, have kids normally and live normally.
That none of the others CAN is why they are so prone to degeneracy.
Bi is the 00s version of queer/nonbinary. Back then there weren't a million different labels to pick from, so if someone (usually a female) wanted to be special they would claim to be bi despite having no same sex romantic/sexual interaction.
Ah yes there does seem to be the higher submissive trait in bi people.
From the guy so submissive he'll take it in the butt to the women more likely to be with another more controlling woman, I heard of bi people falling more for controlling but degenerate people.
The problem with "Bi" is that its not a simple Y/N dichotomy like the rest. As retarded as the Kinsey Scale can be, its not wrong in that people do move along it.
As in, a dude who commonly seeks out other dudes but will sleep with girls if presented is probably much closer to gay than someone who is primarily into girls but likes "traps" at times.
All of them are degenerate, but if we assign things to gays like being predisposed to child predators and flaming faggotry, then we can't just say "oh the Bis are X" when they are either closer or further from that eventual end point.
It is a sliding scale and a generalisation, but it is safe to say the more normal you are in the relationship structure, the more likely you are to resist degenerate behaviour.
There is a reason why the generational nuclear family was a main target by the left to destroy.
The T's may be the most vocal and obnoxious problem in the alphabet soup, but as this story shows they're not the only problem. All flavors of pervert end up fucking kids.
When your entire existence is to push away from normalcy, there is nothing left that is taboo.
Queer theory in a nutshell.
Gays, both fag and lesbian, have been causing untold evil since before the Ts were even worth talking about. We have open secrets, historical documentation, and political parties entirely based on them doing it.
Vagina Monologues felt comfortable talking about corrective rape to turn straight underaged girls into lesbians in the 90s, meaning it was a thing bigger than just the grooming of "political lesbianism" prior. NAMBLA was a founding member in many Gay Organizations for decades and operated openly with child rape being their founding goal.
None of these things were "controversial" until years later when the non-gays noticed and questioned how fucked up it was, which then just buried it.
Victims of abuse perpetrating that abuse. You cannot tell me you become a gay porn star without having some major childhood trauma. This is how they procreate. You are absolutely correct about the non T's in the alphabet soup are a problem too and it's sad it isn't talked about. Remember "we'll convert your children"? Yea..
There’s a reason these freaks have been socially barred from children since the dawn of time
What a surprise, man probably heavily scarred as a child turns into a degenerate and acts like one, I'm shocked!
Well not that shocked.
Out of all the alphabet soup, the ones probably safer with kids is the Bi's, why? Because they CAN be part of a normal family structure, have kids normally and live normally.
That none of the others CAN is why they are so prone to degeneracy.
Bi is the 00s version of queer/nonbinary. Back then there weren't a million different labels to pick from, so if someone (usually a female) wanted to be special they would claim to be bi despite having no same sex romantic/sexual interaction.
A bi woman is an attention whore. A bi man is a faggot in disguise.
Or a beta incel/cuck lying to himself and desperate for a relationship. I've met someone like that.
Ah yes there does seem to be the higher submissive trait in bi people.
From the guy so submissive he'll take it in the butt to the women more likely to be with another more controlling woman, I heard of bi people falling more for controlling but degenerate people.
The problem with "Bi" is that its not a simple Y/N dichotomy like the rest. As retarded as the Kinsey Scale can be, its not wrong in that people do move along it.
As in, a dude who commonly seeks out other dudes but will sleep with girls if presented is probably much closer to gay than someone who is primarily into girls but likes "traps" at times.
All of them are degenerate, but if we assign things to gays like being predisposed to child predators and flaming faggotry, then we can't just say "oh the Bis are X" when they are either closer or further from that eventual end point.
It is a sliding scale and a generalisation, but it is safe to say the more normal you are in the relationship structure, the more likely you are to resist degenerate behaviour.
There is a reason why the generational nuclear family was a main target by the left to destroy.