But did they stop using it to evaluate candidates? This could very easily just be rewording the description to avoid public scrutiny while everything remains unchanged.
time will tell. game slated to come out within the next couple of years are already infected.
I think a good litmus test would be to see what the character creation looks like in the inevitable Splatoon 4 ( assuming they don't opt to make splatoon 3 a never ending live service game like fortnite ). if we still have that bullshit "choose your style" instead of "choose your gender / are you a boy or a girl", then I'll know nothing has changed.
Grummz is right that the fact they're trying to hide it in the first place is a good sign, but also that this time around we can't let go because otherwise they'll just come back like herpes. There are more options than either blackpill or overconfident.
But did they stop using it to evaluate candidates? This could very easily just be rewording the description to avoid public scrutiny while everything remains unchanged.
Upvoted for asking the important questions. Can't be resting on spectral laurels.
They are hiding it better.
People who want to genocide you will not stop at “bad press”
Isn’t the point of DEI money that it HAS to be obvious?
time will tell. game slated to come out within the next couple of years are already infected.
I think a good litmus test would be to see what the character creation looks like in the inevitable Splatoon 4 ( assuming they don't opt to make splatoon 3 a never ending live service game like fortnite ). if we still have that bullshit "choose your style" instead of "choose your gender / are you a boy or a girl", then I'll know nothing has changed.
Grummz is right that the fact they're trying to hide it in the first place is a good sign, but also that this time around we can't let go because otherwise they'll just come back like herpes. There are more options than either blackpill or overconfident.