SCOTUS is pretty clear about fictional depictions of children, provided that such depictions are distinguishable from the real thing. So using AI to create virtual CP that looks exactly like real CP would still be illegal, but drawings that are obviously drawings aren't.
I only found two examples of prosecutions of virtual CP after this case, and one of them involved a guy who also possessed real CP. Regardless, surprise surprise, but crooked cops, DAs, judges, etc don't give a lick of a shit about the Constitution, and will simply disregard it knowing that most people don't have the resources to challenge them. Especially if they can get a plea deal that doesn't completely destroy their life, unlike spending several years in court which will only cement their reputation as a degenerate.
the reality here is that none of these cases are over "slippery slope" issues where there's even room for moral debate.
there are plenty of cases of pedos getting busted. but the bigger issue is now groomers.
we're talking about the people pushing cartoon porn into grade school libraries ... they must be criminally charged. they literally put animated pics of kids blowing each other into grade school classrooms down to kindergarten. that's pedo groomer shit. and time after time, they keep getting busted for sexually assaulting kids.
like the florida anti-groomer laws passed handily because they were in response to a pedo trafficking teacher who organized a field trip, lied to parents, and then brought the kids to a gay bar. this was after multiple school boards in other states had commandeered field trips to push kids into these events, and told parents that any refusal would have child protective services sent to their homes to seize the children. these people are actual pedo groomers, and animated child porn is just one of their avenues.
in the first round of enforcement of florida's anti-groomer law, a couple teachers were released, and when it hit news they got investigated harder... every single one of them are groomers. animated child porn is just one of the vile techniques they use to lure kids in.
Flirting with children is also illegal. Yet flirting with adults is not.
Likewise, sharing cartoon porn with other adults is not the same thing as sharing cartoon porn with kids. It's not the cartoons themselves that are the problem, it's distributing them to actual children.
And SCOTUS overturned that provision you retard.
if you were right, how do you explain all the criminal convictions after that case?
maybe you shouldn't get your law degree from university of social media.
SCOTUS is pretty clear about fictional depictions of children, provided that such depictions are distinguishable from the real thing. So using AI to create virtual CP that looks exactly like real CP would still be illegal, but drawings that are obviously drawings aren't.
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/ashcroft-v-free-speech-coalition/
I only found two examples of prosecutions of virtual CP after this case, and one of them involved a guy who also possessed real CP. Regardless, surprise surprise, but crooked cops, DAs, judges, etc don't give a lick of a shit about the Constitution, and will simply disregard it knowing that most people don't have the resources to challenge them. Especially if they can get a plea deal that doesn't completely destroy their life, unlike spending several years in court which will only cement their reputation as a degenerate.
wikipedia already lists off a bunch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors. and those are just the ones that hit the news.
the reality here is that none of these cases are over "slippery slope" issues where there's even room for moral debate.
there are plenty of cases of pedos getting busted. but the bigger issue is now groomers.
we're talking about the people pushing cartoon porn into grade school libraries ... they must be criminally charged. they literally put animated pics of kids blowing each other into grade school classrooms down to kindergarten. that's pedo groomer shit. and time after time, they keep getting busted for sexually assaulting kids.
like the florida anti-groomer laws passed handily because they were in response to a pedo trafficking teacher who organized a field trip, lied to parents, and then brought the kids to a gay bar. this was after multiple school boards in other states had commandeered field trips to push kids into these events, and told parents that any refusal would have child protective services sent to their homes to seize the children. these people are actual pedo groomers, and animated child porn is just one of their avenues.
in the first round of enforcement of florida's anti-groomer law, a couple teachers were released, and when it hit news they got investigated harder... every single one of them are groomers. animated child porn is just one of the vile techniques they use to lure kids in.
Guess what?
Flirting with children is also illegal. Yet flirting with adults is not.
Likewise, sharing cartoon porn with other adults is not the same thing as sharing cartoon porn with kids. It's not the cartoons themselves that are the problem, it's distributing them to actual children.