They were established in the 19th century as one of the White Man's Burdens, to give aboriginals a place to exist. It was thought they would become self-reliant if they could manage themselves.
Stupidity, substance abuse, violence and gibs / laziness flourished instead.
I’m just tired of the constant discussion of colonialism. Some groups were conquered. You look at the history of any continent and land conquest/colonialism happened.
SJWs are 99% blind to colonialism and opression if both parties are White.
They usually enthousiastically take part in shitting on ''marginalized peoples'' if they are White.
For example, trying to protect a native minority language in Europe gets in the way of mass-migration and accomodation for invaders, so the ZOG government will oppose anything meaningful ( any pressure on migrants to speak the native language = ''racist'' ).
In Canada : any consideration for ''disparate impact'' flies out of the window if we ask ''what about the disparate impact of mass-migration threathening the survival of French and Indigenous languages?''
SJW Crickets.
In Quebec, Mohawk activists ( who are native to the Great Lakes bassin, not Quebec ) decried mandatory French classes in Colleges as ''racist'' because it is ''colonialism'' to force Mohawks to speak French for that class instead of ''their own language''. What is ''their own language'' in this case? English. Lol.
Clown world indeed. Recently I saw a post by someone talking about an African kingdom from around 1600s. They got upset when people in comments pointed out that that kingdom thrived on slavery and was one of the chief providers of slaves to the Europeans. I was laughing because they whine if you “gloss over” European history without mentioning slavery but they are happy to ignore the heavy involvement of Africans with slavery
The same thing is happening to whites and europeans. Our culture and identity destroyed. They manufacture diseases and pour fent and pharma drugs into us and force us to live on the streets. Imprison us in mental hospitals and jails for doing things they haven't permitted yet.
Blue cities are the reservations for whites. The Indians used to be a people before all this. Moral or no they lived self sufficiently and with social continuity.
They keep being given more and more “Exclusive Native Title” (meaning only they can financially benefit from the land, water, mineral resources, etc.) grants, too, which seems to include both where they claim they originally lived, and the land where whitey later forced them to move (the latter being more similar to reservations in the US, in that sense, I guess)…
Which means that they control like 20 - 30% of our landmass, now. And I think up around 50% of the Northern Territory, which is kind of like… Our Oklahoma.
I suppose a difference would be that Abos are extremely restrictive of who gets to enter, or even cross, “their” land, and these places are almost always nearly completely undeveloped, with all the dysfunction that brings…
A casino on said land would be a massive step up, compared to the… Virtually nothing “civilized” that exists on most native title land right now…
But yeah, the better comparison is Canada, for all of this. It’s much more similar than the US, or even NZ, situation…
I would add to my latter point: on this one issue, Australia and Canada followed a more similar path, and then you can argue that NZ and the US followed another (sort of)…
Which I think has to do with the relative development level of the civilizations in question.
The Māori and like, the Huron, Iroquois, etc., had the civilizational/technological know-how to fight back, and then they were able to “adapt” relatively well into the mainstream (particularly Native Americans).
Whereas for the Abos and the Inuits and the like, that… Didn’t occur, and they, even now, refuse to assimilate fully, which results in… What we have here.
I know a large number of Abos, and one (extremely entitled) Native Canadian bloke. The difference between the indigenous who see themselves as “Australian first, Indigenous second” and those who refuse to do so, is… Enormous.
Unfortunately the latter ones tend to get all the gibs, though.
Abos are much lower iq than Indians in the American continent. Some of our Indians were building massive pyramids and civilizations like Cahokia. They figured out how to thrive unlike abos.
In Australia do Aboriginal people have an equivalent of reservations? Sounds like you guys hear nonstop whining about colonialism too
Australia has Reservations for aboriginals.
They were established in the 19th century as one of the White Man's Burdens, to give aboriginals a place to exist. It was thought they would become self-reliant if they could manage themselves.
Stupidity, substance abuse, violence and gibs / laziness flourished instead.
I’m just tired of the constant discussion of colonialism. Some groups were conquered. You look at the history of any continent and land conquest/colonialism happened.
SJWs are 99% blind to colonialism and opression if both parties are White.
They usually enthousiastically take part in shitting on ''marginalized peoples'' if they are White.
For example, trying to protect a native minority language in Europe gets in the way of mass-migration and accomodation for invaders, so the ZOG government will oppose anything meaningful ( any pressure on migrants to speak the native language = ''racist'' ).
In Canada : any consideration for ''disparate impact'' flies out of the window if we ask ''what about the disparate impact of mass-migration threathening the survival of French and Indigenous languages?''
SJW Crickets.
In Quebec, Mohawk activists ( who are native to the Great Lakes bassin, not Quebec ) decried mandatory French classes in Colleges as ''racist'' because it is ''colonialism'' to force Mohawks to speak French for that class instead of ''their own language''. What is ''their own language'' in this case? English. Lol.
Clown World.
Clown world indeed. Recently I saw a post by someone talking about an African kingdom from around 1600s. They got upset when people in comments pointed out that that kingdom thrived on slavery and was one of the chief providers of slaves to the Europeans. I was laughing because they whine if you “gloss over” European history without mentioning slavery but they are happy to ignore the heavy involvement of Africans with slavery
But enough about the US Reservations.
The same thing is happening to whites and europeans. Our culture and identity destroyed. They manufacture diseases and pour fent and pharma drugs into us and force us to live on the streets. Imprison us in mental hospitals and jails for doing things they haven't permitted yet.
Blue cities are the reservations for whites. The Indians used to be a people before all this. Moral or no they lived self sufficiently and with social continuity.
As Rouler said, yep.
They keep being given more and more “Exclusive Native Title” (meaning only they can financially benefit from the land, water, mineral resources, etc.) grants, too, which seems to include both where they claim they originally lived, and the land where whitey later forced them to move (the latter being more similar to reservations in the US, in that sense, I guess)…
Which means that they control like 20 - 30% of our landmass, now. And I think up around 50% of the Northern Territory, which is kind of like… Our Oklahoma.
I suppose a difference would be that Abos are extremely restrictive of who gets to enter, or even cross, “their” land, and these places are almost always nearly completely undeveloped, with all the dysfunction that brings…
A casino on said land would be a massive step up, compared to the… Virtually nothing “civilized” that exists on most native title land right now…
But yeah, the better comparison is Canada, for all of this. It’s much more similar than the US, or even NZ, situation…
I would add to my latter point: on this one issue, Australia and Canada followed a more similar path, and then you can argue that NZ and the US followed another (sort of)…
Which I think has to do with the relative development level of the civilizations in question.
The Māori and like, the Huron, Iroquois, etc., had the civilizational/technological know-how to fight back, and then they were able to “adapt” relatively well into the mainstream (particularly Native Americans).
Whereas for the Abos and the Inuits and the like, that… Didn’t occur, and they, even now, refuse to assimilate fully, which results in… What we have here.
I know a large number of Abos, and one (extremely entitled) Native Canadian bloke. The difference between the indigenous who see themselves as “Australian first, Indigenous second” and those who refuse to do so, is… Enormous.
Unfortunately the latter ones tend to get all the gibs, though.
Abos are much lower iq than Indians in the American continent. Some of our Indians were building massive pyramids and civilizations like Cahokia. They figured out how to thrive unlike abos.