Generally, it can start by people nominating others they think would make a decent choice. I could think of a few names off the top of my head.
Something else to consider is that, if the site works the way I think it does, Dom should be able to maintain admin in the event of an emergency situation.
There is no brigade, just one pedo who's been creating alts for literally years and has apparently decided to start targeting lightly moderated boards.
Yes just get someone who's been on here forever and doesn't ask for it.
That's generally the right approach.
But it's also hard for obviously absentee mods to even notice the trouble free long-term users.
At some point some of the other regular users have to start naming names to make choices.
I get the theory.
But how does one get selected as a candidate without applying or volunteering?
Are we instituting a lottery or a draft?
And that is the central problem of governance.
Generally, it can start by people nominating others they think would make a decent choice. I could think of a few names off the top of my head.
Something else to consider is that, if the site works the way I think it does, Dom should be able to maintain admin in the event of an emergency situation.
That actually makes sense and is an avenue I hadn't considered.
Of course, such a nomination process could be easily gamed as well.
Thats how we tried doing it on c/gaming after the mod threw a fit and left. Too bad the admins completely ignored the nomination threads.
Lottery for comment removing powers. Open mod log easily accessible.
There is no brigade, just one pedo who's been creating alts for literally years and has apparently decided to start targeting lightly moderated boards.