Even nationalism should be questioned. The idea that 330M people should be ruled by 500 isn't that much better than globalism. As much power as possible should be returned to the individual, and power limited as it moves from local to national, as originally envisioned by the framers.
Even nationalism should be questioned. The idea that 330M people should be ruled by 500 isn't that much better than globalism. As much power as possible should be returned to the individual, and power limited as it moves from local to national, as originally envisioned by the framers.
Well, he probably means 'ethno-nationalism', which is undoubtedly the best way to found a government.