The "pile-ons" aspect seems to be a criminalisation of criticism and accountability. That's always been one thing the Government has wanted, a Lese-Majeste law.
Yup. Particularly alarming when you consider that the "eSafety Commissioner" is essentially the whim of one person (Julie Inman-Grant), so I'm sure part of the intention there is to shield her from criticism, herself...
Can't protest the government-appointed chief janny if you're not allowed to "pile on" the chief janny. taps head
It's very on brand for Aus that this woman gets paid nearly half a million dollarydoos a year, and regularly* attends Davos, and this is the first such specially-created "position" in the world. Odd, but definitely "on brand"...
Hmm, I think we need to add more bureaucracy to this deal, How about the government design a special form in which the people need to gather all their criticisms, this form can only be submitted once every 4 year, and the people will have about 2 weeks to fill it in once it has been opened. The request to open is submitted to the government which will review the request and then after arbitrary time up to about 4 years will publish it for the people to fill in. This ensures that that peoples voice are still heard without causing undue mental health problems for our glorious leaders, aswell as ensuring all is done in the proper civilized manner.
I think our politicians and bureaucrats are generally among some of the… More highly-remunerated in the developed world, but I admit that it is still very unusual…
Everything about the “eSafety commissioner” and indeed Julie Inman-Grant’s whole career, is… Unusual.
There’s being “well-connected”, and there’s failing upwards, and then there’s her.
Like that Harvard president, but with much more power and (probably) money, lol.
The "pile-ons" aspect seems to be a criminalisation of criticism and accountability. That's always been one thing the Government has wanted, a Lese-Majeste law.
Yup. Particularly alarming when you consider that the "eSafety Commissioner" is essentially the whim of one person (Julie Inman-Grant), so I'm sure part of the intention there is to shield her from criticism, herself...
Can't protest the government-appointed chief janny if you're not allowed to "pile on" the chief janny. taps head
It's very on brand for Aus that this woman gets paid nearly half a million dollarydoos a year, and regularly* attends Davos, and this is the first such specially-created "position" in the world. Odd, but definitely "on brand"...
Hmm, I think we need to add more bureaucracy to this deal, How about the government design a special form in which the people need to gather all their criticisms, this form can only be submitted once every 4 year, and the people will have about 2 weeks to fill it in once it has been opened. The request to open is submitted to the government which will review the request and then after arbitrary time up to about 4 years will publish it for the people to fill in. This ensures that that peoples voice are still heard without causing undue mental health problems for our glorious leaders, aswell as ensuring all is done in the proper civilized manner.
Brother we only pay the US president 400k a year, what the fuck is going on in Australia
Well she is American, lol…
But honestly, I have no idea.
I think our politicians and bureaucrats are generally among some of the… More highly-remunerated in the developed world, but I admit that it is still very unusual…
Everything about the “eSafety commissioner” and indeed Julie Inman-Grant’s whole career, is… Unusual.
There’s being “well-connected”, and there’s failing upwards, and then there’s her.
Like that Harvard president, but with much more power and (probably) money, lol.