"Women aren't meant to be with one man. They're mothers, and meant to have a lot of babies with different genes for the fitness and survival of the species."
We're also not meant to eat cooked meat originally but we evolved to do that meaning we needed less body processing for raw meat, more could go to cognitive functions.
We're a species that can CHOOSE to be animals or something more, those that choose to be animals should be treated as such.
There's a lot of falsehoods being thrown about in this chat, we absolutely can digest cooked meat, and required no evolutionary change to do so.
We're meant to be a community, based around one man with multiple wives.
The qualities that make us human are the ability to ignore instant gratification and instinctual behavior. Those allow humans to have morals. Morals are necessary for societal function and the advancement of the species.
If you want to live on base animal instinct you're not a human, you're a goblin and you should be treated like one.
Tell that to your pair-bonding hormones. It's more complicated than "IT'S ALL PRIMAL BRO" or someone simply spawning the idea of monogamy, it has an epigenetic context.
The context from which monogamy emerges is always preferable to this one.
Humans are traditionally a tournament species but we adopted pair-bonding as a necessity for a functioning society when we implemented civilisation and farming. Cue the birth control pill, social media, online dating and a raft of other cultural changes which freed women from the consequences of unplanned pregnancy and expectations on men to make a good wife out of the woman he got pregnant plus allowed both to explore sexuality with relatively no cost. Now look at what's happening in the dating market, the top tier men have several women on the go, women are chasing and potentially sharing the top tier men and most men are getting little to no attention.
Men aren't meant to be with one woman. We're animals, and meant to have a tribe.
"Women aren't meant to be with one man. They're mothers, and meant to have a lot of babies with different genes for the fitness and survival of the species."
That shit can go both ways.
Not really, it's much harder for a woman in the wild to provide for multiple children by herself, the role only works with one man, multiple women.
We're also not meant to eat cooked meat originally but we evolved to do that meaning we needed less body processing for raw meat, more could go to cognitive functions.
We're a species that can CHOOSE to be animals or something more, those that choose to be animals should be treated as such.
There's a lot of falsehoods being thrown about in this chat, we absolutely can digest cooked meat, and required no evolutionary change to do so. We're meant to be a community, based around one man with multiple wives.
EVERY animal can eat cooked meat but our prolific use of cooking as a tool led to evolutionary development of the teeth and cognitive functions.
Just like us being paired up than 'one man multiple wives' led to a more stable society and structure.
Remove either two and watch us slip backwards, you're applying an extremely rare exception to the rule and even then multiple wives usually mean two.
Go live in the woods then, faggot.
The qualities that make us human are the ability to ignore instant gratification and instinctual behavior. Those allow humans to have morals. Morals are necessary for societal function and the advancement of the species.
If you want to live on base animal instinct you're not a human, you're a goblin and you should be treated like one.
Sounds like you're the faggot? I'm into pussy, and you're terrified of it. Maybe you need to grow up a little first?
Tell that to your pair-bonding hormones. It's more complicated than "IT'S ALL PRIMAL BRO" or someone simply spawning the idea of monogamy, it has an epigenetic context.
The context from which monogamy emerges is always preferable to this one.
Humans are traditionally a tournament species but we adopted pair-bonding as a necessity for a functioning society when we implemented civilisation and farming. Cue the birth control pill, social media, online dating and a raft of other cultural changes which freed women from the consequences of unplanned pregnancy and expectations on men to make a good wife out of the woman he got pregnant plus allowed both to explore sexuality with relatively no cost. Now look at what's happening in the dating market, the top tier men have several women on the go, women are chasing and potentially sharing the top tier men and most men are getting little to no attention.