If you want to say "I'm not buying anything that has type one/type two, even if it was a well-meaning mistake," that's a stance whose principle I understand and can support.
If you're saying "I'm not willing to assume it was non-malicious," I understand that too.
If you're saying "fuck these guys because despite the explanation, I'm unable to model other minds or account for information disparity," I have to call you an idiot.
If you want to say "I'm not buying anything that has type one/type two, even if it was a well-meaning mistake," that's a stance whose principle I understand and can support.
If you're saying "I'm not willing to assume it was non-malicious," I understand that too.
If you're saying "fuck these guys because despite the explanation, I'm unable to model other minds or account for information disparity," I have to call you an idiot.
They will always take the mile, so why surrender the inch?