Most of the healthcare advice for covid, as it turns out, was done by people who had no business giving those orders. They were not doctors, or virologists, and were merely guessing as to what could work.
The six feet/2 meters apart BS was just plucked from the sky as 'yeah maybe that'd work' and was implemented in every store you went to.
As we found out only recently, some of the 'experts' were just friends of the politicians who were tasked with handling covid, and had interesting job titles, but absolutely no idea how to handle something like this. So it was all guess work. Coming directly from the CDC and WHO.
Your comment implies doctors could have given productive advice re: covid. They could not.
The medical professional class are as bad as journalists. Medical personnel are arguably worse: they have degrees, certifications, high salaries, and the ability to surreptitiously kill people. Their delusions of grandeur are validated at every turn.
That could be on account of the ones that refused the shot are no longer in the field as doctors.
They weeded out the ones that thought for themselves and kept the yes men.
So anything that happens now, all they have to do is just send an order, and know it will be done, even if the outcome means death. That didn't matter. We're all disposable.
That process happened in the 90s, if not earlier. Elaborate reimbursement schemes mean only complicit individuals are in the system. Most of them likely don't view it that way, meaning the medical class is also full of midwits.
Speaking of people who had no business in healthcare, it did seem like a lot of the early bad reactions from the injections were nurses not injecting the stuff properly, or in the wrong place. Not that you want that poison in you at all...
From top down it was handled so poorly you'd almost think it was by design that an entire system that can handle it just decided not to for some reason.
One of the things FDA reviews (or is supposed to review) prior to clearing or approving drugs or medical devices is the risk resulting from misuse. Something which is easy to misuse or where there would be severe consequences resulting from misuse is supposed to be mitigated prior to clearance/approval.
FDA also requires (or is supposed to require) that manufacturers keep track of this post-market, so if the probability of misuse or severity of harm resulting from misuse is higher than expected, that can also trigger corrective actions (recalls and withdrawals of approval in the most severe cases).
Though of course, as we've seen, the normal rules completely went out the window for this thing. Which considering all the stupid shit I had to implement in (far less dangerous) medical devices to prevent (far less harmful) misuse kinda pisses me off.
Most of the healthcare advice for covid, as it turns out, was done by people who had no business giving those orders. They were not doctors, or virologists, and were merely guessing as to what could work.
The six feet/2 meters apart BS was just plucked from the sky as 'yeah maybe that'd work' and was implemented in every store you went to.
As we found out only recently, some of the 'experts' were just friends of the politicians who were tasked with handling covid, and had interesting job titles, but absolutely no idea how to handle something like this. So it was all guess work. Coming directly from the CDC and WHO.
Your comment implies doctors could have given productive advice re: covid. They could not.
The medical professional class are as bad as journalists. Medical personnel are arguably worse: they have degrees, certifications, high salaries, and the ability to surreptitiously kill people. Their delusions of grandeur are validated at every turn.
That could be on account of the ones that refused the shot are no longer in the field as doctors.
They weeded out the ones that thought for themselves and kept the yes men.
So anything that happens now, all they have to do is just send an order, and know it will be done, even if the outcome means death. That didn't matter. We're all disposable.
That process happened in the 90s, if not earlier. Elaborate reimbursement schemes mean only complicit individuals are in the system. Most of them likely don't view it that way, meaning the medical class is also full of midwits.
Speaking of people who had no business in healthcare, it did seem like a lot of the early bad reactions from the injections were nurses not injecting the stuff properly, or in the wrong place. Not that you want that poison in you at all...
From top down it was handled so poorly you'd almost think it was by design that an entire system that can handle it just decided not to for some reason.
One of the things FDA reviews (or is supposed to review) prior to clearing or approving drugs or medical devices is the risk resulting from misuse. Something which is easy to misuse or where there would be severe consequences resulting from misuse is supposed to be mitigated prior to clearance/approval.
FDA also requires (or is supposed to require) that manufacturers keep track of this post-market, so if the probability of misuse or severity of harm resulting from misuse is higher than expected, that can also trigger corrective actions (recalls and withdrawals of approval in the most severe cases).
Though of course, as we've seen, the normal rules completely went out the window for this thing. Which considering all the stupid shit I had to implement in (far less dangerous) medical devices to prevent (far less harmful) misuse kinda pisses me off.