Comment Reported for: Taking his advice. Dom, what do?
Social Shaming is perfectly fine, and preferable to my action. OP, you should archive, not only to deny ad revenue, but also to have a historical record of their statements as most journalist sites will intentionally re-write articles without editors notes or disclaimers. I'm not going to force you to do it, but it is normally a good idea to do it, especially with places like the CBC.
OK I am glad you won´t enforce this because few people archive links, you would have to ban half the people. The Ad revenue thing is a non issue, easily solved with an adblocker what is a serious issue is archive forcing captchas on every single article.
Comment Reported for: Taking his advice. Dom, what do?
Social Shaming is perfectly fine, and preferable to my action. OP, you should archive, not only to deny ad revenue, but also to have a historical record of their statements as most journalist sites will intentionally re-write articles without editors notes or disclaimers. I'm not going to force you to do it, but it is normally a good idea to do it, especially with places like the CBC.
OK I am glad you won´t enforce this because few people archive links, you would have to ban half the people. The Ad revenue thing is a non issue, easily solved with an adblocker what is a serious issue is archive forcing captchas on every single article.
Ad Revenue is an issue; it's just that in this case it's irrelevant because it's government media.
Ad revenue is not a problem if you use an adblocker, it is up to you to do that not me.