The shills are attacking the sweet baby detected curator and his followers
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Well, you know you're over target when you get that kind of flack.
Edit: Wow. Just wow. I checked the curator. And it's not oh my god look how horrible this company is. It just says if they were involved. That's it. That's all it does. It's neither negative nor positive, just that SBI worked on it.
And this is what they do. Definitely over target.
no need to open the bomb bay old chap, seems they've blown themselves up, back to blighty for a cup of tea
Negative, bombardier, higher wants this target to glow in the dark. Get ready to drop... crew, get your tinted goggles on...
Roger, bombs gone, planes yours skipper
To be completely fair, they are listed as “not recommended,” and it is possible for a curator to give a neutral “informational” curation.
Personally I think it’s the right move. If a normie sees an “informational” curation that they’re involved they probably won’t care. Not recommended will make them ask “why?”
Um it's definitely negative, it marks each game as "not recommended."
I should have been more specific.
All of the recommendations say they are not recommended, but the text description is the same for every game. Just that SBI did work on it.
Which is where the not recommended comes from, because the curator is a watchdog style curator where they tell people if SBI worked on the game.
Name the demon and you will have power over them. It's the same thing that happened with LibsofTiktok. Simply reposting their own material, identifying them to the public at large, was treated as though it was a direct threat against their lives.