Is that 21st century conservatism is simply 20th century communism. A jewish woman claiming to be "proud to be Japanese" is subversive as Japan only sees people of pure Japanese blood as being Japanese (As it should be) and she's actively trying to subvert this norm, and trying to push the idea that anyone can be Japanese.
But the West has been so utterly subverted that a foreigner claiming to be "proud to be German" or "proud to be Swedish" is considered "based" , instead of being considered subversive that they are even trying to claim that they are German or Swedish when they are not.
Its the racial version of trannism. (I feel like im a Japanese therefore i am a Japanese. I feel like im a woman therefore i am a woman)
Liberalism is not ever meant to destroy nationhood. If anything, it serves as a mechanism to unify a nation against the oppression of a state. Liberal Nationalism also exists, and was very common in the 19th century. Nationalism itself stems from Liberal pre-suppositions about self-government.
Civic Nationalism does occur within Liberalism, but it is never a requirement.
Communism doesn't tolerate anything outside of Communism. It can, at best, use national identity as a human shield (like Stalin, Tito, and Ceausescu did)
And yet here we are. It has (and continues) to produce exactly this result.
'The result is the purpose' as a wise man once said.
That's because Socialism is what we live under. Liberalism has been beaten down in America since Warren G Harding left office.
I literally dont care. You were trying to claim that civic nationalism is liberalism not communism. But i dont care how you want to call it , either way its all subversive globalist trash. . Any ideology that doesnt put the native founding population first , is globalist subversive trash.
Civic Nationalism is independent to both Liberalism and Communism.
Liberalism puts the founding population first.
No it doesnt. Liberalism wants equality for everyone, that's not the same as putting the founding population first. Liberalism is just communism-lite
It's also the "free" market aspect. That includes the freedom to outsource and bring in immigrant labor.
They want equity, not equality and those are absolutely not the same thing. They want everyone stuck at the same level. Their ideal world is everyone poor and enslaved to the government. They don't need people to be happy. What they need are the masses reliant on them to survive and for them to be in just good enough shape to produce what the globalists need them to.
No, liberalism wants equal application of the law, and that's about it. What we have now is literally the opposite of that.
Liberalism wants equality for the people of it's nation. Liberalism can be expanded outwards, but the question is "Why would you do that?"
The priority remains the nation.