We discussed feds targeting the manosphere here and here. I pondered what this was going to look like here. It looks like this in the works:
I also expect a fresh batch of astroturfed "Breadtubers discuss masculinity" nonsense and promoting of garbage like r/MensLib.
Funneling people onto MensLib has probably been a practice for a while. It was started to act as a foil to the manopshere, especially r/MensRights, afterall. The survey is probably trying to figure out where to send fed shils and what kind of shill techniques were effective. The feds appear out of touch since a number of the commenters are pointing out flaws in the survey. I doubt they will be effective. MensLib is so sensitive to anti-feminism that many issues men care about flatout aren't allowed to be discussed there. I suspect it's been failing miserably to convert men to feminism and will continue to do so.
I might sound paranoid about feds being linked to this, but lefty infighting revealed that Breadtubers have a history of working with feds.
I feel like the manosphere is such a tiny portion of the internet it reeks of the classic overreaction leftists have to anything they deem far right
It's like when the msm freaks out over skinheads marching around. They make it seem like the Klan is rising up again but there are barely enough of them in the whole country to populate a large high school, let alone be an actual threat.
It also treats it as if its a club with membership cards and organization, when the vast majority of "skinheads" are just white trash hanging out with their two cousins and a couple friends drinking and watching the race while ranting about niggers.
I can see what the breadtubers would have to gain by converting more men to feminism, if they could actually do that successfully. I don't see why the feds would bother. What they want is fewer people having kids, especially white people. Yes, feminism is an important contributing factor to that project, but so is the backlash to it. The more men are increasingly alienated by modern women, the fewer kids they are likely to have. The globalist project wins either way.
There also seems to be a fresh push by evolutionary psychologists, researchers and academics very recently to malign single men not succeeding in the dating market in the worst possible way. As far as they are concerned, if you're not partnered or slaying it in the dating market, you're nothing at best.
Some of the stuff I have seen from one of the prominent voices in evopsych in the last 24 hours, Alexander from DatePsychology paints single men as both powerless, pathetic individuals and a greater threat than feminists in terms of extremism and terror threat. I can see people replying to say that they are losing empathy with single men and they deserve to be ostracised and punished by society. To the point where people no longer see them as human beings with ideas, emotions or desires. Which never ends well and usually leads to rule violating suggestions against said men.
Worrying times if you're a single male and you're not succeeding on Tinder on a nightly basis, particularly with the recent fed targeting of single men.
About half the guys I knew in high school (around 2007ish I'd guess) started hating me after they started using 4chan
You can barely get a single scroll before there is a woman (in the Men's sub) making sure you know she is a woman, a victim, and its those evil websites' faults!
Also the survey is so incredibly bad it has to be a glowop, because only a Fed would be so out of touch to not include 4chan or TRP as an option but put in Youtube Shorts. Same with speaking about it like some sort of Cult Movement instead of a loose collection of Ideologies that hate each other.
Good to see Men's Lib hasn't changed though. Its the same reddit as always, but using the "sympathy bomb" to manipulate men into letting women control them instead of the normal outright attacks. It was a joke in the 00s to every single portion of the "manosphere" and it still is.
We discussed feds targeting the manosphere here and here. I pondered what this was going to look like here. It looks like this in the works:
Funneling people onto MensLib has probably been a practice for a while. It was started to act as a foil to the manopshere, especially r/MensRights, afterall. The survey is probably trying to figure out where to send fed shils and what kind of shill techniques were effective. The feds appear out of touch since a number of the commenters are pointing out flaws in the survey. I doubt they will be effective. MensLib is so sensitive to anti-feminism that many issues men care about flatout aren't allowed to be discussed there. I suspect it's been failing miserably to convert men to feminism and will continue to do so.
I might sound paranoid about feds being linked to this, but lefty infighting revealed that Breadtubers have a history of working with feds.
FD Signifier = FED Signifier
Breadtube = Fedtube
It's like when the msm freaks out over skinheads marching around. They make it seem like the Klan is rising up again but there are barely enough of them in the whole country to populate a large high school, let alone be an actual threat.
It also treats it as if its a club with membership cards and organization, when the vast majority of "skinheads" are just white trash hanging out with their two cousins and a couple friends drinking and watching the race while ranting about niggers.
Most Klansmen are undercover feds anyway, with a few retards roped in to justify their federal budget.
I can see what the breadtubers would have to gain by converting more men to feminism, if they could actually do that successfully. I don't see why the feds would bother. What they want is fewer people having kids, especially white people. Yes, feminism is an important contributing factor to that project, but so is the backlash to it. The more men are increasingly alienated by modern women, the fewer kids they are likely to have. The globalist project wins either way.
There also seems to be a fresh push by evolutionary psychologists, researchers and academics very recently to malign single men not succeeding in the dating market in the worst possible way. As far as they are concerned, if you're not partnered or slaying it in the dating market, you're nothing at best.
Some of the stuff I have seen from one of the prominent voices in evopsych in the last 24 hours, Alexander from DatePsychology paints single men as both powerless, pathetic individuals and a greater threat than feminists in terms of extremism and terror threat. I can see people replying to say that they are losing empathy with single men and they deserve to be ostracised and punished by society. To the point where people no longer see them as human beings with ideas, emotions or desires. Which never ends well and usually leads to rule violating suggestions against said men.
Worrying times if you're a single male and you're not succeeding on Tinder on a nightly basis, particularly with the recent fed targeting of single men.
You can barely get a single scroll before there is a woman (in the Men's sub) making sure you know she is a woman, a victim, and its those evil websites' faults!
Also the survey is so incredibly bad it has to be a glowop, because only a Fed would be so out of touch to not include 4chan or TRP as an option but put in Youtube Shorts. Same with speaking about it like some sort of Cult Movement instead of a loose collection of Ideologies that hate each other.
Good to see Men's Lib hasn't changed though. Its the same reddit as always, but using the "sympathy bomb" to manipulate men into letting women control them instead of the normal outright attacks. It was a joke in the 00s to every single portion of the "manosphere" and it still is.