He's right when you're talking about a democracy where women and evil degenerates get a vote. "Can't we just be a little nicer to get the trans-exclusionary black nationalist green single mother vote?"
All he proves is that politics and democracy is faggotry.
You can have a big tent without handing the keys to literal enemies.
Maybe, maybe not. But the conservatives seem completely fucking incapable of walking that line. If it even even slightly works out, it's either because the liberal becomes less liberal on their own, or they're a good enough grifter to not be too overtly liberal. But it's pure luck, and seems to backfire more often than not. If the conservatives could pull it off it might be worth doing, but they've shown they can't. So big tent nonsense is an utter disaster, and needs to be avoided.
I'm talking more the hangers on, the grifters, the conservative-lite "ex-liberals" and the like, not the actual politicians...who are probably scum regardless.
As I said in my other post, Riley Gaines is an excellent current example. She's not a conservative, in fact she's a feminist. And conservatives are falling all over themselves to boost her message, and to agree with her on more liberal ideals, just because she recognizes that men and women are different, and doesn't want men in women's sports. It's sad to see.
I'm talking more the hangers on, the grifters, the conservative-lite "ex-liberals" and the like, not the actual politicians...who are probably scum regardless.
Eh, as far as I can see, they're pretty useful. Also, the difference between conservatives in liberals is that conservatives call everyone a grifter, while liberals create entire institutions with sinecures for people who spout and whitewash the party line (paid with other people's money).
As I said in my other post, Riley Gaines is an excellent current example. She's not a conservative, in fact she's a feminist
Where are you getting that idea? I looked at her Twitter, and it looks basically like Matt Walsh's - not just on troon issues, but also criticizing the media for a hit on Vivek using 'white supremacy'. Basically can't tell her apart from an average conservative.
Now, let's say she's a communist deep down. Does it matter? It shouldn't. The advocacy is decidedly in the correct direction. I don't expect pundits to have opinions to begin with.
You can have a big tent without handing the keys to literal enemies. You should be riding them, not they you.
You absolutely can't. And you are a great example of that.
He's right when you're talking about a democracy where women and evil degenerates get a vote. "Can't we just be a little nicer to get the trans-exclusionary black nationalist green single mother vote?"
All he proves is that politics and democracy is faggotry.
Maybe, maybe not. But the conservatives seem completely fucking incapable of walking that line. If it even even slightly works out, it's either because the liberal becomes less liberal on their own, or they're a good enough grifter to not be too overtly liberal. But it's pure luck, and seems to backfire more often than not. If the conservatives could pull it off it might be worth doing, but they've shown they can't. So big tent nonsense is an utter disaster, and needs to be avoided.
Yup, but again, that's not how it ever works.
What cases are you thinking of? People like Romney are more establishment drones than liberals who are included because of a 'big tent'.
I'm talking more the hangers on, the grifters, the conservative-lite "ex-liberals" and the like, not the actual politicians...who are probably scum regardless.
As I said in my other post, Riley Gaines is an excellent current example. She's not a conservative, in fact she's a feminist. And conservatives are falling all over themselves to boost her message, and to agree with her on more liberal ideals, just because she recognizes that men and women are different, and doesn't want men in women's sports. It's sad to see.
Eh, as far as I can see, they're pretty useful. Also, the difference between conservatives in liberals is that conservatives call everyone a grifter, while liberals create entire institutions with sinecures for people who spout and whitewash the party line (paid with other people's money).
Where are you getting that idea? I looked at her Twitter, and it looks basically like Matt Walsh's - not just on troon issues, but also criticizing the media for a hit on Vivek using 'white supremacy'. Basically can't tell her apart from an average conservative.
Now, let's say she's a communist deep down. Does it matter? It shouldn't. The advocacy is decidedly in the correct direction. I don't expect pundits to have opinions to begin with.