For me, whether he wrote his own work of if he was just a golem for the bad guys, I find the man most useful for discrediting "Science!", because of his recanting black holes before his death.
Besides disproving galactic red shift recently, there hasn't been a more interesting piece of astrophysics in a decade at least.
Basically, galactic red shift being disproven means that the universe isn't expanding infinitely, because not only is movement not observed but a lack of movement was.
Since the galaxy isn't expanding, there cannot have been a single point of origin. No big bang. Probably THE pre-eminent theory used to push atheism in the 20th century was a lie all along.
How readily does that work when considering whether such a point of origin was static in the first place and/or the resultant universe itself is also static?
I enjoyed Hawking’s work but it made me really sad to see he was so opposed to the idea of a creator
For me, whether he wrote his own work of if he was just a golem for the bad guys, I find the man most useful for discrediting "Science!", because of his recanting black holes before his death.
Besides disproving galactic red shift recently, there hasn't been a more interesting piece of astrophysics in a decade at least.
Recanting Black Holes? Explain.
What it says on the tin. He recanted his claim that nothing can escape a black hole.
Oh, I thought he was meaning Black Holes didn't exist. I would have been a little sad about that.
I need to read up on that
Basically, galactic red shift being disproven means that the universe isn't expanding infinitely, because not only is movement not observed but a lack of movement was.
Since the galaxy isn't expanding, there cannot have been a single point of origin. No big bang. Probably THE pre-eminent theory used to push atheism in the 20th century was a lie all along.
How readily does that work when considering whether such a point of origin was static in the first place and/or the resultant universe itself is also static?
Ohhh. Ok now I do remember hearing about that. I guess that does make one wonder how big the universe is. Or if it’s one of many universes
I need some sources that there is insufficient redshift to show universal expansion, because I can't seem to find any and it's a big deal if true.