I live in a historically entirely white European country, which is how it should have stayed. Any argument or person arguing for the destruction of that is a bad actor.
There is a difference between alowing international travel and mass importing millions of migrants until it gets to the point that your ethnic group is the minority in major cities.
My nations history goes back almost 1000 years and that is being swept away in a few decades.
If that wouldn't bother you in your country then I honestly don't know what to say to you.
As to your point on race mixing, a few mixed race families isn't the problem.
An ethnic group is linked to a certain area, tends to look a certain way and has a shared history. Large scale mixing destroys that and replaces it with a fake awful globalist soup.
English people are white, they are not mixed race despite what liberals say. Anyone who is mixed race is by definition less English than me because they have ancestral connections to other countries where as I only have connections to here. If you find that horrible that is your problem. I find it horrible that my county is being swamped by Africans.
I will not be complicit in the destruction and dilution of my nation. If it is going to be destroyed by this tidal wave then the least I can do is not support the bullshit arguments for 'tolerance' and 'diversity' that caused it.
What do you call importing immigrants with the desired goal of making whites a minority while also attacking their history and culture?
Lets say we have a Spanish city and then add Germans until they make 60% of the population, is that city a Spanish city or a German one?
One more, why is "colonialism" considered bad if it was done by Europeans but good when it is done by non-whites? At least when whites colonized there was some benefits, now instead of a technologically superior nation "colonizing" we have a pathetic "suicide".
You seem to think I'm super mad for some reason. I couldn't care less.
nobody likes immigration. and nobody actually wants to do this.
Once again arguing against your own points.
...the rambling of an old man who's some how the president virtually means nothing.
This was years ago, and did he seem to be rambling? And, even if he were, he keeps saying the same thing. It's obviously what he is pushing, and he's in a position of power. "Means nothing," my ass.
especially with how little he has accomplished in his 3 years in office.
Uh, record high immigration? He's accomplished a ton on that front, as well as others like fucking up the economy, and such.
of course this is bad. don't get me wrong.
I thought it was nothing and meaningless?
but will anything happen in his last year in office that will make whites the minority in their own country... probably not.
Again, less than a century ago the country was 90% white. It takes longer than a year, but it is absolutely happening. No, Biden won't personally make it happen in a year. But he and his ilk are certainly accelerating the process, on purpose. Are you really acting like if he doesn't personally make whites a minority by the time he leaves office there is no white genocide? That's terrible logic.
and the next president will probably super conservative anyways, so it kinda balances itself out. kinda
We don't have any super conservatives. Also, how do you slow the roll? Again, +90% white country...no longer. At best a non-Democrat president might slow down the rate it's happening, but won't stop or reverse it.
How do you think a "super conservative" president would stop what's happening?
Because it sounds more like you had an ideological shift, not a logical shift.
but after hearing from other people...
You're listening to the wrong people.
immigration actually effects more non white people... for a whole host of reasons... namely jobs. so immigration en mass is a problem... but it more so effects everyone. not just white people.
This is very surface level, and intentionally misleading. Firstly, it starts in the middle. America used to be +90% white. Immigration obviously affected white people more. Secondly, this argument completely ignores demographics, which is the whole point of white genocide.
Let's for the sake of argument say nonwhites feel some of the effects of immigration more than white people. Again, this is only happening in white majority countries, too.
Here's the question. Are nonwhites in white countries, being flooded with more nonwhites...in danger of global extinction due to immigration? Obviously not. With only a few exceptions, such as the Native Americans, who are a perfect example of what getting invaded and outbred will do to your population and your bloodlines.
2nd one which is the one that made me write off white genocide as a concept.
I'll hear you out, but it seems pretty silly to write off a whole concept - with a lot of backing evidence behind it, to boot - based on one argument. Better be a damn good one!
was race mixing. and genetically speaking their is no such thing as a "pure race" anyways.
Nope. It's retarded.
Race isn't real, white people aren't real, so they can't be genocided. Miss me with that. Again, all these arguments are surface level bad faith arguments that exist solely to deny obvious reality. Basic linguistic trickery.
so "white" "black" etc. technically speaking. aren't just races anymore.
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't mean you can't change it more, or change one group - whites or blacks - disproportionately.
Also, the idea that the goal is to change whites is a bit of a dodge. Whites just need to stop having kids at replacement level, and import nonwhites instead, and the scales keep falling. Less white people, more everyone else...leads to eventual white extinction.
a simple dna test shows us most if not almost everyone has mixed blood within them.
No, no, no, no, no. If 'race' isn't real, there's certainly nothing such as 'mixed blood.' And again, it ignores proportionality. Some people are more or less 'mixed' than others. Someone could, for example, be 99% "white" and 1% black. Or they could be 50%/50%, or 1%/99% in the other direction. Those are clearly not the same. They're all "mixed," but they're obviously all distinct. And, while not entirely accurate if you want to play semantics, those people are clearly, respectively, white, mixed, and black.
The concept of "race mixing" being the down fall of white people...
Again, was never really the argument. It's a part of the argument, but not the whole thing. Also, again, disingenuous. If you have a country with 90%-100% white people, race mixing will be extremely rare. If you have a country with 50% white people, race mixing will get more common. Clearly the second scenario is going to lead to less white people. Clearly, immigration/race mixing does have an effect on demographics. It's clear as day, and only academics and indoctrinated normies will tell you otherwise.
...race mixing also effects other races to! so another example of "white genocide" also applying to non white people.
Yeah, no. It's nowhere near as common and, again, just proximity. White people are the primary ones living in "mixed" or "majority" countries. Asians live in Asian countries, blacks largely live in black countries, and such. Much less race mixing if you have homogeneous society. This is just another dodge argued by people trying desperate to do everything they can to avoid and obfuscate the issue.
and as we all know, history never has any bad white people oh no sir we bob! all the bad people throughout history have only been non white people. and the good guys have been only ever white don't ya know.
Another massive strawman. This was never the argument. Not even worth responding to. You're either being stupid, intentionally obtuse, or both. Of course there are bad white people.
White replacement in the media. isn't the same as white replacement in the real world.
No, they're not the same. But both are happening. One thing not being the same as another doesn't disprove the other.
however it is bad. don't get me wrong, and indeed 1 sided. but this shit that's happening to whites now... it's a slap on the wrist compared to what non-whites of the past had to go through.
Wait, so white genocide is real, but it's more polite than other genocides you want to dig up from the past?
Again, i'm not denying you whites aren't getting your asses handed to you legally. and their is a stigma in being proud of your race... in a largely white country i get that. but the stuff you guys are talking about... aren't even effecting just you guys. it's kinda effecting everyone. so i don't really care all that much. i mean i do but i just fail to see how this is a white issue.
How is it not? What other race is discriminated against in the US? And certainly so openly? Name how any of the "totally not white issues" are affecting other races.
if genocide is simply being slowly edged out of the gene pool... that's not really a bad way to go. especially if no one dies. so i don't see the problem in this.
So, racial sterilization would be fine? It's about the same, what's the difference?
kinda seemed like if america had closed boarders. this wouldn't be an issue.
Wait. Immigration isn't causing white genocide, but if it weren't for immigration white people wouldn't be getting genocided? Are you for real? *sigh*
i wonder why whites don't wanna go to non-white countries. but non-whites flock to white countries. really weird.
Nonwhite countries aren't paying white people to come to the country illegally? Nonwhite countries aren't giving free room and board and monthly stipends to white people who come to the countries illegally?
i don't give 2 shits about a tribe that sold their land for beeds. and as for racial extinction... who cares?
Yeah, and I'm the Nazi.
i know that in gene wise. white is a thing. pure white... not so much.
Yeah, but you're the only one talking about racial purity. And you failed to grasp my example of 1% white versus 99% white. Just because something isn't "pure" doesn't mean it can't still be diluted.
and yeah no shit sherlock. if whites were 90-100% of the pop. race mixing would amount to shit.
Again, you're making the argument that immigration does negatively impact the native population.
in real life... where? nobody likes the en mass of foreigners. nobody likes the bullshit the left are doing with history.
So, these things that are happening aren't, or don't matter, because you claim people don't like them? Irrelevant, because they're being done to us.
just the consequence of living in a mixed race country.
Again, we weren't a "mixed race country" until it was brutally forced on us.
the problem your seeing isn't something new. but something that's been there since this country inception.
That was a nice OP.
Now do the same to all those other countries in Africa or Asia but reversed with the wypipo instead.
They will be thrilled with all the new arrivals.
In small proportions. People naturally prefer their own race, and will generally date and start families with members of their own race. There's an orchestrated push to promote race mixing. Race mixing itself might be "natural," but the current form and attitude around it is not natural.
Remember, "natural" and "normal" are two separate things. They're trying to normalize something that is not normal.
...of living in a mixed race country.
Funny how the only 'mixed race countries' are majority white countries.
...so sooner rather then later everyone would've been brown goo anyways.
No. White people will be "brown goo." Asians in Asia will still be Asian. Blacks in Africa will still be black. Jews in Israel will still be Jewish. Latino people in South/Central America will be Latino. And so on.
Only whites will be brown goo, if the trend continues. That's the problem. That's where you can point and ask, "is this genocide?" Because it sure looks like it. And it's happening in every white country.
Heck, the very term "X majority country" is basically only applied to white countries. It's yet another clever linguistic slide. Because it leaves wiggle room. It's not immutable. Majority can mean anything from 51% white, to 100% white. And it hold true up until, whoops, not a white majority country anymore, poof.
I've been nothing but polite to you up to this point, for the record. You've called me all sorts of names and told me to die multiple times, and now you sent me seven fucking retarded essays today. So I'll keep this brief:
The fuck do you mean, "not natrual"
Learn to read, retard.
...natural, and normal, are not the same. but let's look at the both terms mean. shall we? natural. is something that appears naturally in nature. while normal. is the standard. like... normally. it's not natural, for john and mindy to date. (mixed race couple)
Learn to think, retard. You contradicted yourself multiple times in such a short time, and don't seem to be able to grasp basic issues, much less articulate them.
race mixing is a harmless concept.
I just laid out why it's not, and you ignored everything as per usual.
i fail to see how promoting something as you agreed upon is natural. harmful.
I live in a historically entirely white European country, which is how it should have stayed. Any argument or person arguing for the destruction of that is a bad actor.
There is a difference between alowing international travel and mass importing millions of migrants until it gets to the point that your ethnic group is the minority in major cities.
My nations history goes back almost 1000 years and that is being swept away in a few decades.
If that wouldn't bother you in your country then I honestly don't know what to say to you.
As to your point on race mixing, a few mixed race families isn't the problem.
An ethnic group is linked to a certain area, tends to look a certain way and has a shared history. Large scale mixing destroys that and replaces it with a fake awful globalist soup.
I'm white English.
English people are white, they are not mixed race despite what liberals say. Anyone who is mixed race is by definition less English than me because they have ancestral connections to other countries where as I only have connections to here. If you find that horrible that is your problem. I find it horrible that my county is being swamped by Africans.
I will not be complicit in the destruction and dilution of my nation. If it is going to be destroyed by this tidal wave then the least I can do is not support the bullshit arguments for 'tolerance' and 'diversity' that caused it.
When 8% of a global population is forced to mix with the other 92% what happens? I can’t imagine you passed high school with that level of stupidity.
https://archive.ph/FVPZc
Well he doesn't understand per capita, so yeah, he is innumerate.
Is it the same dude? Who needs research to understand per capita?
It's the same dude, he admitted it multiple times, and also types exactly the same, and engages in the exact same behavior.
And, no, he can't understand per capita even with research. He also seems to think that arguing in 'bad faith' is what atheists do.
Why the mods allow him to keep making fake accounts?
He was never banned, so it's not ban evasion.
He self-exiled. He got fed up with people "misunderstanding" him and stuff, told us we were all Nazis, he was leaving, and he'd never be back.
Then he came back.
LUL
Allergic to the truth, huh? Too bad.
What do you call importing immigrants with the desired goal of making whites a minority while also attacking their history and culture?
Lets say we have a Spanish city and then add Germans until they make 60% of the population, is that city a Spanish city or a German one?
One more, why is "colonialism" considered bad if it was done by Europeans but good when it is done by non-whites? At least when whites colonized there was some benefits, now instead of a technologically superior nation "colonizing" we have a pathetic "suicide".
Never claimed this, in fact is one of the arguments I bring up when leftists bitch about colonialism.
I'll just leave this here.
You seem to think I'm super mad for some reason. I couldn't care less.
Once again arguing against your own points.
This was years ago, and did he seem to be rambling? And, even if he were, he keeps saying the same thing. It's obviously what he is pushing, and he's in a position of power. "Means nothing," my ass.
Uh, record high immigration? He's accomplished a ton on that front, as well as others like fucking up the economy, and such.
I thought it was nothing and meaningless?
Again, less than a century ago the country was 90% white. It takes longer than a year, but it is absolutely happening. No, Biden won't personally make it happen in a year. But he and his ilk are certainly accelerating the process, on purpose. Are you really acting like if he doesn't personally make whites a minority by the time he leaves office there is no white genocide? That's terrible logic.
We don't have any super conservatives. Also, how do you slow the roll? Again, +90% white country...no longer. At best a non-Democrat president might slow down the rate it's happening, but won't stop or reverse it.
How do you think a "super conservative" president would stop what's happening?
Stop replying to month old posts with your retarded essays.
You have the IQ of a log. Get some help.
Now that's a good one.
Do you no longer believe it's good to help white people? Do you no longer believe there are double standards at play?
What changed? Especially when they keep bragging about it.
Because it sounds more like you had an ideological shift, not a logical shift.
You're listening to the wrong people.
This is very surface level, and intentionally misleading. Firstly, it starts in the middle. America used to be +90% white. Immigration obviously affected white people more. Secondly, this argument completely ignores demographics, which is the whole point of white genocide.
Let's for the sake of argument say nonwhites feel some of the effects of immigration more than white people. Again, this is only happening in white majority countries, too.
Here's the question. Are nonwhites in white countries, being flooded with more nonwhites...in danger of global extinction due to immigration? Obviously not. With only a few exceptions, such as the Native Americans, who are a perfect example of what getting invaded and outbred will do to your population and your bloodlines.
I'll hear you out, but it seems pretty silly to write off a whole concept - with a lot of backing evidence behind it, to boot - based on one argument. Better be a damn good one!
Nope. It's retarded.
Race isn't real, white people aren't real, so they can't be genocided. Miss me with that. Again, all these arguments are surface level bad faith arguments that exist solely to deny obvious reality. Basic linguistic trickery.
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't mean you can't change it more, or change one group - whites or blacks - disproportionately.
Also, the idea that the goal is to change whites is a bit of a dodge. Whites just need to stop having kids at replacement level, and import nonwhites instead, and the scales keep falling. Less white people, more everyone else...leads to eventual white extinction.
No, no, no, no, no. If 'race' isn't real, there's certainly nothing such as 'mixed blood.' And again, it ignores proportionality. Some people are more or less 'mixed' than others. Someone could, for example, be 99% "white" and 1% black. Or they could be 50%/50%, or 1%/99% in the other direction. Those are clearly not the same. They're all "mixed," but they're obviously all distinct. And, while not entirely accurate if you want to play semantics, those people are clearly, respectively, white, mixed, and black.
Again, was never really the argument. It's a part of the argument, but not the whole thing. Also, again, disingenuous. If you have a country with 90%-100% white people, race mixing will be extremely rare. If you have a country with 50% white people, race mixing will get more common. Clearly the second scenario is going to lead to less white people. Clearly, immigration/race mixing does have an effect on demographics. It's clear as day, and only academics and indoctrinated normies will tell you otherwise.
Yeah, no. It's nowhere near as common and, again, just proximity. White people are the primary ones living in "mixed" or "majority" countries. Asians live in Asian countries, blacks largely live in black countries, and such. Much less race mixing if you have homogeneous society. This is just another dodge argued by people trying desperate to do everything they can to avoid and obfuscate the issue.
Another massive strawman. This was never the argument. Not even worth responding to. You're either being stupid, intentionally obtuse, or both. Of course there are bad white people.
No, they're not the same. But both are happening. One thing not being the same as another doesn't disprove the other.
Wait, so white genocide is real, but it's more polite than other genocides you want to dig up from the past?
How is it not? What other race is discriminated against in the US? And certainly so openly? Name how any of the "totally not white issues" are affecting other races.
So, racial sterilization would be fine? It's about the same, what's the difference?
Wait. Immigration isn't causing white genocide, but if it weren't for immigration white people wouldn't be getting genocided? Are you for real? *sigh*
Nonwhite countries aren't paying white people to come to the country illegally? Nonwhite countries aren't giving free room and board and monthly stipends to white people who come to the countries illegally?
Yeah, and I'm the Nazi.
Yeah, but you're the only one talking about racial purity. And you failed to grasp my example of 1% white versus 99% white. Just because something isn't "pure" doesn't mean it can't still be diluted.
Again, you're making the argument that immigration does negatively impact the native population.
So, these things that are happening aren't, or don't matter, because you claim people don't like them? Irrelevant, because they're being done to us.
Again, we weren't a "mixed race country" until it was brutally forced on us.
Absolute bullshit, as I laid out multiple times.
Stop replying to month old posts with your retarded essays.
You have the IQ of a brick. Get some help.
That was a nice OP. Now do the same to all those other countries in Africa or Asia but reversed with the wypipo instead. They will be thrilled with all the new arrivals.
Post Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (promoting genocide)
Post Approved: This isn't doing this, and is mostly just giving default liberal analysis.
This is what my country should look like when you go to a music festival. Not the negrofied garbage it is today:
https://odysee.com/@CandidMan:6/whiteamerica1:5
It doesn't look like this because whites are being genocided in their own countries.
Well, you clearly don't and I surely don't give a fuck about you. What's your point?
Just talking about the problems of modernity.
In small proportions. People naturally prefer their own race, and will generally date and start families with members of their own race. There's an orchestrated push to promote race mixing. Race mixing itself might be "natural," but the current form and attitude around it is not natural.
Remember, "natural" and "normal" are two separate things. They're trying to normalize something that is not normal.
Funny how the only 'mixed race countries' are majority white countries.
No. White people will be "brown goo." Asians in Asia will still be Asian. Blacks in Africa will still be black. Jews in Israel will still be Jewish. Latino people in South/Central America will be Latino. And so on.
Only whites will be brown goo, if the trend continues. That's the problem. That's where you can point and ask, "is this genocide?" Because it sure looks like it. And it's happening in every white country.
Heck, the very term "X majority country" is basically only applied to white countries. It's yet another clever linguistic slide. Because it leaves wiggle room. It's not immutable. Majority can mean anything from 51% white, to 100% white. And it hold true up until, whoops, not a white majority country anymore, poof.
I've been nothing but polite to you up to this point, for the record. You've called me all sorts of names and told me to die multiple times, and now you sent me seven fucking retarded essays today. So I'll keep this brief:
Learn to read, retard.
Learn to think, retard. You contradicted yourself multiple times in such a short time, and don't seem to be able to grasp basic issues, much less articulate them.
I just laid out why it's not, and you ignored everything as per usual.
Learn to read.
LOL.
Stop replying to month old posts with your retarded essays.
You have the IQ of a spoon. Get some help.
lol
That's specially true for Israel. I don't know why they try to isolate so badly when it's more probably they'll end up asimilated by their neighbours