He also thinks of himself as a "journalist and a historian." He's far above us and the fray. Just an academic observer.
From this you should not expect him to 'get' anything, and he won't. He's a hardened casual of the worst sort. One who believes himself to be a stoic intellectual.
He'll juggle some facts and names, do some leg work to write his book. And never come close understanding the subject.
He said in one of the other posts that he has no interest in most of the topics discussed here.
He also thinks of himself as a "journalist and a historian." He's far above us and the fray. Just an academic observer.
From this you should not expect him to 'get' anything, and he won't. He's a hardened casual of the worst sort. One who believes himself to be a stoic intellectual.
He'll juggle some facts and names, do some leg work to write his book. And never come close understanding the subject.
What do you think I'm missing about the subject?