“Science teacher” pretends to understand science
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
I like how - even among this absolute sea of bullshit framing and extreme cope - the actual "trans" stuff still seems anti-scientific. You know you've got a losing argument when you can go from 'molds have thousands of sexes' to 'let's talk about trans humans' and you still look like a fucking schizo cultist.
Hahaha. You're a fucking joke.
Essentialism wins!
... does anybody with a male heart and a male brain in a female body make it out of the womb, or do they die in vitro due to what I must assume would be a massive autoimmune response?
She ment esoteric ''your heart and soul totally is what you delusional imagination fabricated in your head''.
As for the vanishingly-rare chimeras of fraternal twins of different sexes where one embryo was absorbed by the other, if they are alive at birth, they can live a normal life and usually never know they are a chimera. Usually only few parts of the body present a DNA patchwork.
If the fraternal twin was the same sex there is no fertility issue. If it's the opposite sex it can result in infertility if the patchwork is too strong within the sex organs.
In extremely rare cases, paternity / maternity tests incorrectly led people to believe a child wasen't theirs, but you can tell something is off because the child would seem to be from the uncle/aunt ( the chimeric DNA is from a fraternal twin ).
All good points. Ones I might expect someone familar with the topic, such as a science teacher, to be able to make, rather than wishy-washy talk like "but your heart and brain are male."
This isn't even transgender (if they were being honest). After all, gender is entirely social. There is no reason to even speak about male and female due to it being a social construct. This is why you don't need either surgery or "passing" to be transgender.
This is someone attempting to refute biological sex entirely.
And also that whole "body/brain" thing is entirely fictious. There is no such thing. The brain doesn't develop a separate sex.
If the comment changed "sexual" to human or even mammalian in the first sentence, her entire argument would have never had the option to muddy the waters with extra information that she knows don't fit the intended context.
"Sexual Dimorophism isn't so clear cut in humans"
"What does that have to do with transgenderism, a political ideology?"
No animal can be transgender, because no animal is political.
They will never admit that is a political ideology. They will just keep trying to use circular reasoning to prove it into existence.
Just as they will claim that Marxism is an economic theory and not a political ideology.
But, muh gender-fluid ducks and non-binary donkey!