I love how they're tripping all over themselves, though, if nothing else.
Boobs too big? Male gaze/sexism/misogyny/etc., NOT ALLOWED.
Boobs too small but character also short? Literally pedophilia, NOT ALLOWED.
So what is allowed? I don't know, giantess ugly man-like creatures with no boobs (which is fine on ugly giants), ALLOWED. In fact, MANDATORY.
The most empowered a woman can ever be is being as similar to a man as possible. And the most empowered a man can ever be is beating women at sports. Progressivism!
And remember, the real issue is choice. They want to force their shit on you, they don't want you to even have the option of creating attractive female characters. If you try to add in sexy, or remove trans nonsense, you get banned from the mod sites though. It's sad but hilarious; "oh more choices is better...no, no, not like that! Just when we're trying to force degenerate nonsense on you as a 'choice,' that's great. You turning down that choice is fascism."
Boobs too small but character also short? Literally pedophilia, NOT ALLOWED.
The "short" part isn't even necessarily required.
The female character posted on the bottom was Sorceress from Dragon's Crown, who the head editor of Kotaku called a "pedophile's fantasy" even though she's clearly a fairly tall woman and her breasts are gigantic.
I was more referencing some game that actually removed a whole "small" bodytype because some retard on Twitter or something whined about "sexualization," which was nonsense.
the head editor of Kotaku called a "pedophile's fantasy" even though she's clearly a fairly tall woman and her breasts are gigantic.
Yup, that was a classic. Didn't he even say this aforementioned giant-breasted adult was a "loli" or something?
What's even funnier is that he could have posted the Elf Archer from the same game, who is short and flat and very young looking (in the generic anime sense), and had at least a leg to stand on by calling it "pedo."
But the Sorceress was the big viral thing everyone was talking about with the game, so he had to attach it to his point to get the clickbait going.
They were fine with the elf because she was basically not sexualized at all, they were just going after Sorceress and Amazon because those were the ones which had strong sex appeal to the vast majority of male players.
It's funny because I remember having a look at the Sims 4 search results for this sort of thing and there were even people on the forums generally complaining about how fugly the pre-generated sims were compared to custom. The normies really don't realise this is all a very deliberate design choice and that's why they're cancer on any franchise.
I love how they're tripping all over themselves, though, if nothing else.
Boobs too big? Male gaze/sexism/misogyny/etc., NOT ALLOWED.
Boobs too small but character also short? Literally pedophilia, NOT ALLOWED.
So what is allowed? I don't know, giantess ugly man-like creatures with no boobs (which is fine on ugly giants), ALLOWED. In fact, MANDATORY.
The most empowered a woman can ever be is being as similar to a man as possible. And the most empowered a man can ever be is beating women at sports. Progressivism!
And remember, the real issue is choice. They want to force their shit on you, they don't want you to even have the option of creating attractive female characters. If you try to add in sexy, or remove trans nonsense, you get banned from the mod sites though. It's sad but hilarious; "oh more choices is better...no, no, not like that! Just when we're trying to force degenerate nonsense on you as a 'choice,' that's great. You turning down that choice is fascism."
The "short" part isn't even necessarily required.
The female character posted on the bottom was Sorceress from Dragon's Crown, who the head editor of Kotaku called a "pedophile's fantasy" even though she's clearly a fairly tall woman and her breasts are gigantic.
(and they also attacked the game in other ways)
I was more referencing some game that actually removed a whole "small" bodytype because some retard on Twitter or something whined about "sexualization," which was nonsense.
Yup, that was a classic. Didn't he even say this aforementioned giant-breasted adult was a "loli" or something?
What's even funnier is that he could have posted the Elf Archer from the same game, who is short and flat and very young looking (in the generic anime sense), and had at least a leg to stand on by calling it "pedo."
But the Sorceress was the big viral thing everyone was talking about with the game, so he had to attach it to his point to get the clickbait going.
They were fine with the elf because she was basically not sexualized at all, they were just going after Sorceress and Amazon because those were the ones which had strong sex appeal to the vast majority of male players.
The artist's retort was the best part. Drew the dwarf shirtless and said "here, is this what you wanted fag"
It's funny because I remember having a look at the Sims 4 search results for this sort of thing and there were even people on the forums generally complaining about how fugly the pre-generated sims were compared to custom. The normies really don't realise this is all a very deliberate design choice and that's why they're cancer on any franchise.
Lesbian romance stories between ugly she-men like TLOU2
All modern prog bullshit is a quest for revenge of entirely imaginary historical wrongs.
What was that one game where game devs or journalists were upset that people made mostly white characters? Lawl.
Actually this same one, haha. Baldur's Gate 3.
Something about everyone making "basic vault dweller" or something.
I had a friend who became a woke freak, very obese, but loved this game and character. Current Year is stupid.