A while back, I watched a review of Starship Troopers on YouTube, by some skeletal english faggot. I always overestimate my ability to tolerate these soylent grinned and their constant mixing of left-wing activism with impotent, infantile sarcasm, so I could only put up with it for a short while. The bit I watched was entirely just about the Heinlein book and the bit about their society being stable and conservative for some 500 years. The feckless bassoon couldn't comprehend a world in which there was no more progress, no more destruction of society for no other reason than sheer radicalism, that everything would settle into a society shaped to serve those that serve IT and the parasites would be left behind, forced to feed on the scraps. Never even got to the movie, but Verhoeven was explicit about painting America as Nazi Germany so fuck him, too.
All of Verhoeven's movies, from his very first short he did as a teenager, can be summed up as "Mean Nahtsees Do Thing". RoboCop is Mean Nahtsees Take Detroit, Starship Troopers is Mean Nahtsees Take Showers...
The most telling change is the knife training scene. In the book, one recruit asks why they are learning knife fighting when they have tactical nukes, and the instructor explains the importance of being capable of responding appropriately no matter the level of violence required - a folly we see today with female police officers who are incapable of challenging a criminal physically and so have no tools between "ask for cooperation" and "shoot him."
In the movie the instructor instead stabs the recruit in the hand for wanting to understand why the training was important, because Verhoeven is a troglodyte.
It's a shame because Robocop was really a classic (and the dystopian future-Detroit of the 80s is idyllic compared to the reality) but if it was remade today all the gang members and drug dealers would be gudboi dindunuffins
And that's why the book should be taught in schools. Heinlein was prescient, and actually understood our history and national design, and the book is a long argument for a corrective change to our system. Our representative republic was never meant to have universal voting by every retarded clown that wants to be ruled.
Using MLAI (machine learning AI) structured by "sensitivity trainers" that come from "diverse" and "inclusive" backgrounds, the MLAI for YouTube comments basically culls anything that the AI detects as "negativity" toward "diverse" or "marginalised" groups. Somehow women, Liberals, environmentalists, atheists, prostitutes/whores, black people, pagans, and anyone on the alphabet soup spectrum qualify.
The "sensitivity trainers" are basically given comments and responses to scour through and rate responses based on how negative or positive they are and whether they attack/demean/degrade the aforementioned groups. The MLAI uses the prompts from "sensitivity trainers" to gauge the comments and responses/replies to build out a database to determine if comments need to be purged or not for being "negative".
You'll be able to tell if your comment is actually visible by opening up an incognito window of the video link and seeing if your comment displays. Usually if you don't make too many negative comments about the above groups then they might let a comment or two slip, as your comment-credit score isn't low enough for automatic removal, but if you frequently leave "negative" comments, then they'll auto-purge your comment within 20 seconds.
If your comment is still there after 25 seconds, then it's likely safe.
I imagine it will be even worse for 2024. I notice Conservatives are at least catching on to this and have altered their word-phrasing to thwart the attempts by the MLAI, using terms like "OnlyFools", "Garden tools" or "304s" to overcome the censorship of words associated with negative connotations of sex work.
I doubt Leftists will catch on, though, as they were the main ones advocating that big corps enable censorship because "they don't have to abide by free speech because they're private companies".
I'm curious how many Leftists will still be cheering on the censorship of certain ideas they espouse that don't align with the establishment?
A while back, I watched a review of Starship Troopers on YouTube, by some skeletal english faggot. I always overestimate my ability to tolerate these soylent grinned and their constant mixing of left-wing activism with impotent, infantile sarcasm, so I could only put up with it for a short while. The bit I watched was entirely just about the Heinlein book and the bit about their society being stable and conservative for some 500 years. The feckless bassoon couldn't comprehend a world in which there was no more progress, no more destruction of society for no other reason than sheer radicalism, that everything would settle into a society shaped to serve those that serve IT and the parasites would be left behind, forced to feed on the scraps. Never even got to the movie, but Verhoeven was explicit about painting America as Nazi Germany so fuck him, too.
All of Verhoeven's movies, from his very first short he did as a teenager, can be summed up as "Mean Nahtsees Do Thing". RoboCop is Mean Nahtsees Take Detroit, Starship Troopers is Mean Nahtsees Take Showers...
The only country I recall from ST was Argentina, where Rico was from.
Which is on what continent?
Check.
Mate.
The most telling change is the knife training scene. In the book, one recruit asks why they are learning knife fighting when they have tactical nukes, and the instructor explains the importance of being capable of responding appropriately no matter the level of violence required - a folly we see today with female police officers who are incapable of challenging a criminal physically and so have no tools between "ask for cooperation" and "shoot him."
In the movie the instructor instead stabs the recruit in the hand for wanting to understand why the training was important, because Verhoeven is a troglodyte.
It's a shame because Robocop was really a classic (and the dystopian future-Detroit of the 80s is idyllic compared to the reality) but if it was remade today all the gang members and drug dealers would be gudboi dindunuffins
The gangs will all be huwite
And that's why the book should be taught in schools. Heinlein was prescient, and actually understood our history and national design, and the book is a long argument for a corrective change to our system. Our representative republic was never meant to have universal voting by every retarded clown that wants to be ruled.
Sadly your comment probably doesn't even show up.
Using MLAI (machine learning AI) structured by "sensitivity trainers" that come from "diverse" and "inclusive" backgrounds, the MLAI for YouTube comments basically culls anything that the AI detects as "negativity" toward "diverse" or "marginalised" groups. Somehow women, Liberals, environmentalists, atheists, prostitutes/whores, black people, pagans, and anyone on the alphabet soup spectrum qualify.
The "sensitivity trainers" are basically given comments and responses to scour through and rate responses based on how negative or positive they are and whether they attack/demean/degrade the aforementioned groups. The MLAI uses the prompts from "sensitivity trainers" to gauge the comments and responses/replies to build out a database to determine if comments need to be purged or not for being "negative".
You'll be able to tell if your comment is actually visible by opening up an incognito window of the video link and seeing if your comment displays. Usually if you don't make too many negative comments about the above groups then they might let a comment or two slip, as your comment-credit score isn't low enough for automatic removal, but if you frequently leave "negative" comments, then they'll auto-purge your comment within 20 seconds.
If your comment is still there after 25 seconds, then it's likely safe.
Yeah, they did the same thing back in 2020, too.
I imagine it will be even worse for 2024. I notice Conservatives are at least catching on to this and have altered their word-phrasing to thwart the attempts by the MLAI, using terms like "OnlyFools", "Garden tools" or "304s" to overcome the censorship of words associated with negative connotations of sex work.
I doubt Leftists will catch on, though, as they were the main ones advocating that big corps enable censorship because "they don't have to abide by free speech because they're private companies".
I'm curious how many Leftists will still be cheering on the censorship of certain ideas they espouse that don't align with the establishment?
What's a 304?