Well, the summary says "arranging to rape", not "raped". Maybe the sentence was lighter because he didn't actually go through with it and was stopped before he could.
Considering he was on his way to meet with the "father" of the boy he intended to rape, with numerous times affirming and saying he was going to do just that, I don't think that distinction needs to be made.
The only reason he didn't rape was because it was a sting all along, he absolutely was going to otherwise.
Probably because the entire thing was a sting from the beginning and using a "mother" in that role would probably get them some heat from the mindless wokes and feminists.
In real life I have little doubt it would have been a woman in that role.
Seems like a light sentence. I wonder if his rainbow shield in court bought him some time off?
Perhaps it was the nose.
Well, the summary says "arranging to rape", not "raped". Maybe the sentence was lighter because he didn't actually go through with it and was stopped before he could.
Considering he was on his way to meet with the "father" of the boy he intended to rape, with numerous times affirming and saying he was going to do just that, I don't think that distinction needs to be made.
The only reason he didn't rape was because it was a sting all along, he absolutely was going to otherwise.
First time I've heard of a father being involved in a transaction. Usually it's the (single) mother.
Probably because the entire thing was a sting from the beginning and using a "mother" in that role would probably get them some heat from the mindless wokes and feminists.
In real life I have little doubt it would have been a woman in that role.
It seems like gay male pedos would trust "dads" more.