If you can’t that means zionists control the US government and white nationalists are a non-entity
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
And now you're arguing like a jew because you're wrong. BDS is explicitly anti-zionist and their website even says how being anti-zionist isn't the same as being anti-semetic.
This is absolutely retarded. What does it mean that I can name 3 politicians who are anti-zionist, then? If you say it still means the US is controlled by zionists, the whole thing is worthless.
I guess. I feel baited, but I did bite. So you did win on that.
Ok so only capable of conflation.
You keep saying this but in fact the retarded part is how you were inspired to make a new sock because you don’t know how to read
How disingenuous can you be? Even this will probably be handwaved by you in some way, but I'll link it anyways: https://archive.is/1Md2d
And if you can fulfil half of what you asked, what becomes of this retarded thought excercise? It still means that white nationalists are a non-threat and a non-entity. Are you going to say that because I named anti-zionists, white nationalists are a threat (which is retarded)? Because it'd be equally retarded to say that because I can't name white nationalists, that zionists aren't a threat and don't have power.
Retool this horribly constructed thought experiment. And don't be a double retard and try to use it on any normie, let alone a lib/prog/dem/another type of faggot if you're trying to make a point about zionist control of the US.
I’ll humor you. Let’s just say that every member of The Squad and a handful of libertarians like Rand Paul and Thomas Massie qualify as “not zionists”.
It’s still on you to explain why 98% of Congress is sucking zionist dong and passing laws making it illegal for government contractors to criticize israel (i.e. anti-BDS laws), much less explain why the “greatest threat to our democracy” (i.e. Creme Supremes) has literally zero power or presence in society
Feel free, faggot. That would be infinitely more productive than your cry-bitching so far
Golly would you look at that:
https://media.communities.win/post/JPFckJBCtOiO.png
Looks like it’s 99.5% of them you’ll have to explain
There are 435 members in the House. If you're going to count present as a vote against, why not those who were absent or abstained? 95% is staggering support, still. No need to inflate it when most people don't care about the minute difference. It's similar to the stupidity of your thought exercise in that your point can be made without easily being proven wrong because of hyperbole/retardation.
I'd just focus on the ridiculous level of bipartisan support for Israel, like that House vote proves, and then how it's impossible to name any politician or law passed that forwards white nationalism.
You thought about me enough to respond 2 extra times instead of just editing your post to make sure I saw it, just because I didn't respond fast enough for you. Lol. You queer.
Yeah that’s what I thought you fucking parasite