Yeah I didn't think that normally judges had a little pre-trial with the prosecutor where they decide guilt or innocence, then just continue with a trial for show. A lot of the law is just sophistry to justify injustice.
Actually one of the main excuses is that in a civil trial you don't have any rights. I've seen summary judgement used against a lot of people.
Did he do that - I had thought that was a bit of online hyperbole.
Edit: He DID fucking do that. Holy shit we are living in the most corrupt empire stage. Aren't we. Fuck.
Yeah I didn't think that normally judges had a little pre-trial with the prosecutor where they decide guilt or innocence, then just continue with a trial for show. A lot of the law is just sophistry to justify injustice.
Actually one of the main excuses is that in a civil trial you don't have any rights. I've seen summary judgement used against a lot of people.