it's because the government takes them from men to give to women and this inequity is one of the major reasons why things are so bad today.
Child support is one of the biggest travesties of the modern era. On paper, it sounds like a good idea. Children should not be made to suffer because of the actions of their parents. The problem however, is that we don't live on paper, we live in the real world. In the real world, child support checks are made out to the mother, not the child. The money is not given the slightest bit of oversight in how it is spent, and as long as the child isn't a starving malnourished vegetable, the state doesn't care. The amount of money is also technically unlimited because it depends on the other spouse's salary, which is almost always a man.
This amount almost never goes down, but can easily go up should the mother want it to. See the case of Dave Foley, who lost his TV gig as a comedian. Because his child support payments were calculated around the salary he was commanding as a TV presenter, he was paying something like $10k Canadian per month. This was not sustainable for him, obviously, and he went to court multiple times to attempt to lower it, being unsuccessful in his attempt, and racking up lawyer fees. It got so bad that he had to flee Canada to the United States because he would have been locked up in prison for failure to pay child support, the modern debtors prison. His ex wife had moved and taken the children somewhere he could not find them, and he hasn't seen them since.
The amount of men who have killed themselves because they become indentured servants to their ex wives is too damn high, and it's solely because they are men that nobody gives a shit. If women were subject to even half the treatment that men are in the court system it would be considered a nationwide crisis.
Are there statistics on that? This is not a gotcha.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Child support is one of the biggest travesties of the modern era. On paper, it sounds like a good idea. Children should not be made to suffer because of the actions of their parents. The problem however, is that we don't live on paper, we live in the real world. In the real world, child support checks are made out to the mother, not the child. The money is not given the slightest bit of oversight in how it is spent, and as long as the child isn't a starving malnourished vegetable, the state doesn't care. The amount of money is also technically unlimited because it depends on the other spouse's salary, which is almost always a man.
This amount almost never goes down, but can easily go up should the mother want it to. See the case of Dave Foley, who lost his TV gig as a comedian. Because his child support payments were calculated around the salary he was commanding as a TV presenter, he was paying something like $10k Canadian per month. This was not sustainable for him, obviously, and he went to court multiple times to attempt to lower it, being unsuccessful in his attempt, and racking up lawyer fees. It got so bad that he had to flee Canada to the United States because he would have been locked up in prison for failure to pay child support, the modern debtors prison. His ex wife had moved and taken the children somewhere he could not find them, and he hasn't seen them since.
The amount of men who have killed themselves because they become indentured servants to their ex wives is too damn high, and it's solely because they are men that nobody gives a shit. If women were subject to even half the treatment that men are in the court system it would be considered a nationwide crisis.
Are there statistics on that? This is not a gotcha.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Just to be clear, you make an empirical claim and have absolutely nothing to back it up with?
Good to know, thanks for the reply making it clear.
Suck my cock you sophist faggot. Go back to Reddit where you belong.