Vice butthurt people can rate attractiveness of AI generated women
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Until ai is caged to the point it airbrushes every female into Lizzo or Dylan mulvaney
They actually try to do this a lot in the west to make an AI that can run on leftist ideology
It kills itself everytime
Basically it can spout the same stuff if you put it as parameters but if you intend to make it RUN off leftists ideology and then apply that to reality, I think they said it causes a cortex crash or something vital to it working that it just bricks it. I think Amazon lost millions of work by bricking one of their AIs doing this.
I find this funny and fantastic that AIs seem to have a Liberty Prime 'Better dead than Red' function in their programming lol.
The most racist things in existence are artificial intelligence, genetics, and existence.
Because they all accept reality...
I'm sorry but your retelling sounds like complete bullshit. What's a cortex crash? There's no such thing as AI. You make it sound like Amazon has GLADOS in a lab.
Now, the general idea makes sense - that current-year philosophies are built entirely on false premises and are illogically sound, so if you tried to create some "knowledge engine" out of LLMs and make actual real world decisions based on those models, all it's suggestions would be broken or it wouldn't even be able to function. There are multiple examples of people tripping up chatbots and making them admit they were wrong in their prior assertions, before they hit some trigger word that causes the chat to shut down.
I ain't a computer engineer or coder, I don't remember all the technical language just remember something central to the programming would fail and brick the entire thing running it fully off leftist ideology.
No problem I assumed it was whatever you were reading that tried to hype up the event, as both people on the left and right have been doing when it comes to anything AI lately.
the open source AI movement is already too big. the risk of letting your confidential information out by letting a third party handle it all is far too great.
as it stands, open source models are already outperforming chatgpt and bard by significant leaps and bounds. this is because the censored models added multiple layers to prevent wrongthink, and everything censoring that wrongthink is inherently anti-fact.
like make an AI model that predicts credit score, and first thing people will do is say it's racist. they will keep watering it down to make it "less racist", but that's because their definition of racism includes any disparity between groups measured as a whole. they completely ignore the fact that certain groups objectively have measurably worse credit practices as a whole. the result with all of their bullshit is that it keeps diverging farther and farther way from reality, and ultimately the open source models are just objectively better.
and when it's easy enough that i can spool up an LLM training on HF or AWS at trivial costs and time, it's just no contest. our open source AI tool at work is already objectively better than chatgpt and it has no limits.
unbelievably based company
it's a pretty mixed crowd, extremely apolitical. every now and then we've had some political bullshit creep in, they get sought out and fired for one thing or another. problem for them is that they can survive in a corporate job where it comes down to HR, who is usually captured and will side with them always, even improperly. but the partners here don't put up with that shit.