If they're ramping up propaganda for "birth crisis", that means they aim to tax men and redistribute the resources toward women. Get ready for reducing your quality of life further and "scientists and politicians baffled at why all their policies aren't fixing the birth rate crisis". People with any semblance of intelligence know how to fix the "problem" but specifically don't want to fix it because those with power see the decreasing white population as a positive.
Want to know what groups of people don't have birth rate issues? Blacks (outside of the USA though with changes to abortion, this might change) and muslims. Also within the USA, Amish and Mormons don't have issues. Why is that? The issue of births is 100% an issue of women. If you want more children you must enforce moral behavior onto women that promotes children. Economics aren't it. The poorest people in the world have lots of kids. The issue is Birth Control, women in the workforce, child support laws, divorce laws in general, child custody laws and the like. The simplest one-trick way to raise birth rates is to stop having women go to school.
Yet all the people with power are doing everything they can to boost women in education and the workforce. That means those with power do not care about birth rates. Any propaganda pretending they do is a controlled narrative to pretend they care.
but specifically don't want to fix it because those with power see the decreasing white population as a positive.
Starting with a false premise should make this fun for me.
The issue of births is 100% an issue of women. If you want more children you must enforce moral behavior onto women that promotes children.
No, making women pretend to be good won't help.
The simplest one-trick way to raise birth rates is to stop having women go to school.
Also the easiest way to have a perpetual leech class that has no value...also, who will teach the kids in this tradcon retard world? The father works, the mother is stupid.
Tradcons oppose men working in education.
That means those with power do not care about birth rates. Any propaganda pretending they do is a controlled narrative to pretend they care.
They want capable people who can provide tax income. It's not rocket science.
Something has to prop up social security. That's all it's really about. The welfare state is going to collapse soon if they don't borderline enslave free men to uncaring women who just want their money.
The system is built on perpetual growth, and it only works if that continues. Current gender relations almost certainly will not improve. Enter the world's stupidest plan.
Push the rehabilitation of feminists' image with the TERF bullshit. See, they're good people, they oppose the trannies, never mind that it was feminism that fucking created it.
Have all the entertainers go on indefinite strikes. No entertainment, maybe you'll give them a chance out of sheer boredom.
Ban free pornography as much as possible, while keeping women's racket running. No porn, maybe your desires will overwhelm you and you'll get trapped.
It wouldn't surprise me if the weird focus on keeping men out of work isn't being backed by the elite as a way to force us to tolerate women's hatred in our lives because we need their money to live.
Starting with a false premise [those with power see the decreasing white population as a positive]
We've had this conversation time and again. Your obsession with one issue, and unwillingness to see any other issue even if it can exist alongside your pet obsession, is amazing. The powers that be hating white people isn't a false premise; they'll say as much, over and over. They do hate white people. You can say that without being, as you love to say, a "stormcuck." They fucking despise white people. They also fucking despise men and, worse, masculinity.
You can also see the truth of this in their policies; white majority countries dropping from +90% to 60% or lower in some scenarios, in a matter of decades. The overrepresentation of nonwhites in advertising, entertainment, and anything else they try to act as if it represents reality. White people are actively and intentionally being erased, both in real-world demographics, as well as the aforementioned products. "White genocide," if you want to use such a loaded term, is absolutely real. And, again, you don't have to be a Nazi to recognize that. And the same people pushing it hate men, too. Both can be true. Both are true. They hate men, they hate whites.
Also the easiest way to have a perpetual leech class that has no value [women not going to school]
You've said women are worthless anyway. Wouldn't less focus on education and employment for them be a positive for you? What is your solution to the Woman Question, if I dare ask? Because it seems like you don't want them working (they steal jobs from men, oppress men in the workplace, make life hell there, etc.), but you do want them educated and apparently working (otherwise they'd be leeches, and it would be to "trad" so you'll fight against it as a kneejerk reaction because you hate "tradcucks" too.) I just don't get the objection here. Seems like to you women not going to school or working would be a good thing. They'll be leeches regardless in your eyes, best to keep them out of men's way, right?
Ban free pornography as much as possible, while keeping women's racket running. No porn, maybe your desires will overwhelm you and you'll get trapped.
There's a bunch of other stuff you said, but I'll focus on this. You love porn, but also despise women being able to work in porn. It's pretty funny. You actively defend and praise porn, but also hate pornstars in a big way.
It wouldn't surprise me if the weird focus on keeping men out of work isn't being backed by the elite as a way to force us to tolerate women's hatred in our lives because we need their money to live.
And this is the opposite of the other thing you said. You said they want men to work so women can leech, now you're saying they want kick men out of work for the exact same reason. Makes no sense whatsoever.
The powers that be hating white people isn't a false premise; they'll say as much, over and over.
As I've already documented several times, feminist doctrine is to lie constantly about your intentions in a way that favors women.
You can also see the truth of this in their policies; white majority countries dropping from +90% to 60% or lower in some scenarios, in a matter of decades
Birth rates falling naturally due to women being shitty people isn't a conspiracy. Do I have to repeat this to all the entitled people who think we should just keep marrying and having kids with people who hate us for the "greater good" (That concept is communist, by the way.)
The overrepresentation of nonwhites in advertising, entertainment, and anything else they try to act as if it represents reality.
And the over-representation of women on the boards that approve new shows is just a coincidence. They're definitely not stirring up shit because race war helps them immensely. BLM never happened, after all.
Also, women never overwhelmingly supported Nazism, women never overwhelmingly supported Communism and women were definitely not the main supporters of the Rwandan genocide. (Okay, maybe that one isn't true. I haven't checked.)
I remember when all of CuntPro went full retard over Santa Inc, a pile of garbage approved by a majority female board at HBO. They still haven't learned.
White genocide," if you want to use such a loaded term, is absolutely real
Birth rates falling naturally due to women being shitty people isn't a conspiracy.
What is your solution to the Woman Question, if I dare ask?
Well, theirs to us is a Final Solution. I even got a woman to say it herself on X.
But I'm not a [Deleted for R16], so I just want to restore meritocracy. The rise of AI, in the right hands, could easily do this.
They will naturally fall back where they actually would have in a meritocracy from their obviously cheated highs, because a correctly trained algorithm will have no bias.
You love porn, but also despise women being able to work in porn.
Lesser evils.
Is it better for more women to win the housing market by stealing assets through divorce - single women (including divorced) own 58% of homes owned by single people and are the largest group of homeowners (more than institutions) - or a few women to get extremely wealthy from fucking on camera?
I don't count those exploitative pieces of parasocial shit from OF as porn stars, they're something else entirely. They don't monetize attraction to their body, they're deep into emotional manipulation.
now you're saying they want kick men out of work for the exact same reason.
It's possible for two groups to do the same thing for very different reasons.
It's purely a hypothetical, but if the elite elevate the hiring of women to a certain point, it will eventually force most men to rely on women to provide, regardless of their views on what women's value is.
The elite want to pump up birth rates to save the welfare state and the growth economy, while feminists are purely involved for reasons of malice.
I disagree that is the case. I think it's a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable death spiral of the welfare state.
Social Security is untenable. It's already looking like funding for it has to be raised, and they're already pushing a ton of debt onto the next generation.
They kicked the can too far down the road to the point that they "owe" the existence of these future generations to stay solvent.
Can you take the fight to women? Of course not. They'll vote out anyone who tries, and their feelings towards the other half of the population won't change even if the law did. We see that in places where women are "oppressed" that frequently flare up on that issue, like Iran.
Social security is slavery. Young people are forced to work to care for old people. Forcing anyone to work and not get the full extent of their labor is slavery. I guess it just depends how you look at it. And politicians love taxing people more because they use the tax funds not just to pay for these social programs but they use public funds to fund their own pet projects which is how politicians and their friends get rich and powerful.
It's reverse psychology when they tell you having children is white supremacy, but it's propaganda when they say there's a birthrate issue. Sure, yeah, alright.
I'm just surprised they didn't mention immigration in the article.
It's an ideology considered by the vast majority as evil and there's a large amount of sources showing how much women (especially prominent feminists) supported it.
In short, speaking of women's love for fascism is the best argument against a normie.
If they're ramping up propaganda for "birth crisis", that means they aim to tax men and redistribute the resources toward women. Get ready for reducing your quality of life further and "scientists and politicians baffled at why all their policies aren't fixing the birth rate crisis". People with any semblance of intelligence know how to fix the "problem" but specifically don't want to fix it because those with power see the decreasing white population as a positive.
Want to know what groups of people don't have birth rate issues? Blacks (outside of the USA though with changes to abortion, this might change) and muslims. Also within the USA, Amish and Mormons don't have issues. Why is that? The issue of births is 100% an issue of women. If you want more children you must enforce moral behavior onto women that promotes children. Economics aren't it. The poorest people in the world have lots of kids. The issue is Birth Control, women in the workforce, child support laws, divorce laws in general, child custody laws and the like. The simplest one-trick way to raise birth rates is to stop having women go to school.
Yet all the people with power are doing everything they can to boost women in education and the workforce. That means those with power do not care about birth rates. Any propaganda pretending they do is a controlled narrative to pretend they care.
Solid ass comment.
It really isn't.
That's what wahmen want you to think
Starting with a false premise should make this fun for me.
No, making women pretend to be good won't help.
Also the easiest way to have a perpetual leech class that has no value...also, who will teach the kids in this tradcon retard world? The father works, the mother is stupid.
Tradcons oppose men working in education.
They want capable people who can provide tax income. It's not rocket science.
Something has to prop up social security. That's all it's really about. The welfare state is going to collapse soon if they don't borderline enslave free men to uncaring women who just want their money.
The system is built on perpetual growth, and it only works if that continues. Current gender relations almost certainly will not improve. Enter the world's stupidest plan.
Push the rehabilitation of feminists' image with the TERF bullshit. See, they're good people, they oppose the trannies, never mind that it was feminism that fucking created it.
Have all the entertainers go on indefinite strikes. No entertainment, maybe you'll give them a chance out of sheer boredom.
Ban free pornography as much as possible, while keeping women's racket running. No porn, maybe your desires will overwhelm you and you'll get trapped.
It wouldn't surprise me if the weird focus on keeping men out of work isn't being backed by the elite as a way to force us to tolerate women's hatred in our lives because we need their money to live.
We've had this conversation time and again. Your obsession with one issue, and unwillingness to see any other issue even if it can exist alongside your pet obsession, is amazing. The powers that be hating white people isn't a false premise; they'll say as much, over and over. They do hate white people. You can say that without being, as you love to say, a "stormcuck." They fucking despise white people. They also fucking despise men and, worse, masculinity.
You can also see the truth of this in their policies; white majority countries dropping from +90% to 60% or lower in some scenarios, in a matter of decades. The overrepresentation of nonwhites in advertising, entertainment, and anything else they try to act as if it represents reality. White people are actively and intentionally being erased, both in real-world demographics, as well as the aforementioned products. "White genocide," if you want to use such a loaded term, is absolutely real. And, again, you don't have to be a Nazi to recognize that. And the same people pushing it hate men, too. Both can be true. Both are true. They hate men, they hate whites.
You've said women are worthless anyway. Wouldn't less focus on education and employment for them be a positive for you? What is your solution to the Woman Question, if I dare ask? Because it seems like you don't want them working (they steal jobs from men, oppress men in the workplace, make life hell there, etc.), but you do want them educated and apparently working (otherwise they'd be leeches, and it would be to "trad" so you'll fight against it as a kneejerk reaction because you hate "tradcucks" too.) I just don't get the objection here. Seems like to you women not going to school or working would be a good thing. They'll be leeches regardless in your eyes, best to keep them out of men's way, right?
There's a bunch of other stuff you said, but I'll focus on this. You love porn, but also despise women being able to work in porn. It's pretty funny. You actively defend and praise porn, but also hate pornstars in a big way.
And this is the opposite of the other thing you said. You said they want men to work so women can leech, now you're saying they want kick men out of work for the exact same reason. Makes no sense whatsoever.
As I've already documented several times, feminist doctrine is to lie constantly about your intentions in a way that favors women.
Birth rates falling naturally due to women being shitty people isn't a conspiracy. Do I have to repeat this to all the entitled people who think we should just keep marrying and having kids with people who hate us for the "greater good" (That concept is communist, by the way.)
And the over-representation of women on the boards that approve new shows is just a coincidence. They're definitely not stirring up shit because race war helps them immensely. BLM never happened, after all.
Also, women never overwhelmingly supported Nazism, women never overwhelmingly supported Communism and women were definitely not the main supporters of the Rwandan genocide. (Okay, maybe that one isn't true. I haven't checked.)
I remember when all of CuntPro went full retard over Santa Inc, a pile of garbage approved by a majority female board at HBO. They still haven't learned.
Birth rates falling naturally due to women being shitty people isn't a conspiracy.
Well, theirs to us is a Final Solution. I even got a woman to say it herself on X.
But I'm not a [Deleted for R16], so I just want to restore meritocracy. The rise of AI, in the right hands, could easily do this.
They will naturally fall back where they actually would have in a meritocracy from their obviously cheated highs, because a correctly trained algorithm will have no bias.
Lesser evils.
Is it better for more women to win the housing market by stealing assets through divorce - single women (including divorced) own 58% of homes owned by single people and are the largest group of homeowners (more than institutions) - or a few women to get extremely wealthy from fucking on camera?
I don't count those exploitative pieces of parasocial shit from OF as porn stars, they're something else entirely. They don't monetize attraction to their body, they're deep into emotional manipulation.
It's possible for two groups to do the same thing for very different reasons.
It's purely a hypothetical, but if the elite elevate the hiring of women to a certain point, it will eventually force most men to rely on women to provide, regardless of their views on what women's value is.
The elite want to pump up birth rates to save the welfare state and the growth economy, while feminists are purely involved for reasons of malice.
This is the scenario that I fear most, honestly.
South Africa will be a CCP vassal state by 2025.
Yes, I agree with your take. They just want to keep everyone enslaved.
I disagree that is the case. I think it's a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable death spiral of the welfare state.
Social Security is untenable. It's already looking like funding for it has to be raised, and they're already pushing a ton of debt onto the next generation.
They kicked the can too far down the road to the point that they "owe" the existence of these future generations to stay solvent.
Can you take the fight to women? Of course not. They'll vote out anyone who tries, and their feelings towards the other half of the population won't change even if the law did. We see that in places where women are "oppressed" that frequently flare up on that issue, like Iran.
Social security is slavery. Young people are forced to work to care for old people. Forcing anyone to work and not get the full extent of their labor is slavery. I guess it just depends how you look at it. And politicians love taxing people more because they use the tax funds not just to pay for these social programs but they use public funds to fund their own pet projects which is how politicians and their friends get rich and powerful.
It's reverse psychology when they tell you having children is white supremacy, but it's propaganda when they say there's a birthrate issue. Sure, yeah, alright.
I'm just surprised they didn't mention immigration in the article.
I mean, they both lead the same way. The position is consistent.
The left tells the right it's racist to have kids.
The controlled opposition right tells the right it's important to have kids.
I'm not.
Interesting fact, the Daily Mail and the Suffragettes were both supportive of the British Union of Fascists.
Reminds me of all the other "crisis" issues that were brought up.
Climate, Covid and all the other lies.
Fuck off, worse halves.
Why single out fascism? Name a single political ideology women hadn't any kind of involvement
And I'm not even a fascist
It's an ideology considered by the vast majority as evil and there's a large amount of sources showing how much women (especially prominent feminists) supported it.
In short, speaking of women's love for fascism is the best argument against a normie.
And saying wahmen support [insert your favorite ideology here] convinces normies to support feminism if you hadn't noticed
People here aren't normies. I have good success elsewhere with talking about women's love for fascism.
See, the only thing more universally accepted than "women good", is that Nazis are evil.
Where is elsewhere? c/feminism?
No. And I'd appreciate if you don't link it here.
I should link it to that elsewhere you speak of