In the wake of Trump’s motorcade driving through the Atlanta ghetto - in order to film a few black people cheering for a conservative - we’re once again seeing a bunch of conservative talking heads rehash the same tired bullshit about blacks waking up to the corruption and degeneracy of the left. These pundits are claiming that black support for Trump is now at 20% and climbing!
Nonsense. The reality is that we have a cottage industry of black content creators, influencers, and reactors who promote conservatism not for a black audience but rather for a white conservative audience. Because white conservatives are absolutely terrified of being labeled racist, so black creators are ready to cash in with content that serves that demographic.
Blacks are never going to support republicans.
I agree that this is a problem: telling the truth and presenting evidence doesn't often persuade people, but it does help to delegitimize liars and zealots.
Not sure what gave you the idea I was an intellectual though.
I know the ideological narrative when it's spit back at me. It's the same shit. If someone's arguing about how we should adopt the Labour Theory of Value to set prices for good, I know they are a Marxist. That's an accurate assessment. I don't need to wait hours for them to finally admit it, I can just point it out and call them on their bullshit. If you fall into that ideology, it's not my problem that you don't want to be associated with the label that comes with it. "I'm not a Communist, I just think that if we equitably re-distribute wealth to the proletariat, we'll stop the inevitable violence that stems from the dialectical materialism!" No, that's communism. I know that, the person saying it knows that, we all know that, they are just playing stupid.
I don't disagree (except for that sell part). The problem is that I have cogent counter-points to motivated reasoning that people actually accept. That is why I'm "subversive". I said something that counters the narrative successfully.
As for selling, I'm not trying to "sell" you on not being a racialist idiot. In the same way I don't try to "sell" people to not play in traffic. It's horribly self-destructive and you shouldn't do it, but I can't stop you if you insist. Now, when you start dragging people into traffic, or trying to convince other people to play in traffic with you, that's when I have to challenge the bullshit.
You didn't come in with genuine opinions any of the other times, and you explicitly said you didn't. That's your fault, not mine. You are being a bit better today, so I'll give you that.
Hey, you know what doesn't delegitimize anyone?
Making yourself the center of negative attention to the point where no one listens to anything you say, and leaving all your FACTS AND LOGIC useless babble into the void.
Of course, its all dogwhistles and "I knows it when I sees it!" Someone who has a slight observation of there maybe looking like a lot of Jews in Hollywood is just a Stormfag trying to trick you! Everyone is in on the ruse and moves in lockstep, so you can reject everyone who disagrees with you instantly and equally!
It is funny you say this after saying "I'm totes not trying to be an intellectual." Because " I don't need to wait hours for [you] to finally admit it, I can just point it out and call [you] on [your] bullshit."
Yes, you are so smart and effective and great and that's why people take issue with you. Do you even hear yourself? All you keep doing is saying "I'M RIGHT THAT'S WHY EVERYONE HATES ME I'M SMARTER THAN THEM AND THEY HATE IT!!!"
I don't recall doing anything of the sort. I do recall you saying that your interpretation of what I said is what I believe, and then saying I admitted to saying things and continuing to crow about me saying things I never said in a spiral to circle jerk how bad faith I was.
I will, under no circumstance, be given anything but negative attention by all nearby stormfags, at all times, for disputing a stormfag. This is the essence of collectivism. Find the target: label, slander, defame.
I know it when I see it because I listen to them. I understand their ideology. Like other Leftists, sometimes I end up confronting people who don't understand their own ideology as much as I do. This is because I listened to them, understood them, saw where they were coming from, and saw how wrong they were about everything.
You'll note that your comparison has never been a legitimate criticism. It's never a 'slight difference of opinion in Hollywood about the number of jews'. That's an easy conversation. That's an issue about identifying the cause of a disparity in outcome, which normally the result of natural processes.
The issue is that I'm only greeted from stormfags with: "Jews control Hollywood because, as a race, they are dedicated to spreading jewish propaganda to hypnotize and pacify white populations, and get them to accept socialist values which will allow for a jewish takeover of society. They have an additional objective to disseminate porn to the masses as a weapon of war against white populations to pacify them in general and dissolve families as part of a larger genocidal campaign."
How do I know that? Well, because that's the argument I get every time someone mentions jews in Hollywood. Even if it was not by a stormfag, and only done in passing.
Then they should stop literally telling me that.
Yes, because it was your exact words.
Yes of course. Its all a perfect conspiracy of lockstep actions against you that they have coordinated together to always immediately discredit. Because you are so smart and special see? They have to, they all crawl out of the woodwork to shut you down because if not the people might turn against them!!
Once again, your narcissism bleeds through everything you saw. But considering you came back to this nearly a week later, I suppose just you responding is an act of hurt ego constructed to act like a principled position.
Except it has, because that's literally a situation I went through. Not from you, to make that clear, but over the lifespan of this little shithole we share and priorly on reddit. I had no strong feelings about Jews, but I did agree "hey there are a lot of them clustered in places, that's a little odd" and I had anti-Stormfags jump down my throat that I was a secret Stormfag who needed to admit to my foul sin! I was just pretending to "notice" and "just ask questions" as a dogwhistle to trick the ignorant normies to my side!!
That's why I take such umbrage against you anti-Stormfag tards. Its why I went at Antonio dozens of times over his crusade against them. Because you are so deep in your little mindgames you construct this fucking psycho drama where everyone is working in conspiracy to accomplish some grand task with subterfuge and secret codes.
Considering how you seem to interpret my words and extract "you said exactly this and are now gaslighting me by not agreeing with my narrative of them omg" from them, I take massive doubt with them actually saying anything close to that to you.
No, it's just how ideological possession works. The same thing would happen if I were arguing with Communists. Nothing I could ever think, do, or say would be tolerated because the Friend-Enemy distinction is in effect. This is why you can't apologize. It's not conspiracy, it's zealotry.
I'm just going through my replies, dog. Sometimes I forget to look at the date.
I'm not surprised, because it's literally the only thing they do. Is this the part where I call you a idiot narcissist who thinks that all non-stormfags are part of a conspiracy to oppress your enlightened centrist, disinterested, pseudo-intellectualism? No, that would be doing that thing you just did to me. So you went through some confusion on the internet, many sympathies. Where did I say that you can't ask disparate impact questions that stem from the worthless propaganda that public school instills in children?
If you don't want me to misinterpret your exact words in the exact way that you used them, you should probably use different words. If you say "I'm going to steal your tomatoes", I'm going to interpret that as: you want to steal my tomatoes. If you intended to say: "I would like to borrow your grapefruit", you should not say "I will steal your tomatoes" because it expresses a completely different idea.
Goalpost moving about how theft and borrowing are basically the same, and claiming grapefruits are satirical tomatoes is bullshit, and you know that. Honestly, I'm not sure why I wrote all that out. You know when you lie, and explaining that lying to my face means you are lying to my face is silly when we both know that you're lying. IDK, maybe I just have a problem with gaslighting.