You're hilarious. There are no societies that have ever existed without an unbalanced distribution of power. That's how societies get created to begin with.
And secondly, no, being well off does not cause the desire to do harm any more than owning a weapon causes the desire to do harm. Your ideas are outright childish at best, leftist at worst.
Now do guns.
Weapon inequality is a threat to civilization.
Faggot.
So proliferating something isn't relevant then?
Almost like the means by which someone does harm, be it weapons, money, etc, aren't relevant. The wicked desire to do harm is.
"Muh wealth inequality" is the biggest damn red herring in existence.
It's difficult for me to believe that you're this retarded.
Concentrated power is prima facia anti-civilization. There are no societies that survive with an exacerbated power imbalance.
Wealth inequality CAUSES the desire to do harm you half wit.
How so?
You're hilarious. There are no societies that have ever existed without an unbalanced distribution of power. That's how societies get created to begin with.
And secondly, no, being well off does not cause the desire to do harm any more than owning a weapon causes the desire to do harm. Your ideas are outright childish at best, leftist at worst.