You're hilarious. There are no societies that have ever existed without an unbalanced distribution of power. That's how societies get created to begin with.
And secondly, no, being well off does not cause the desire to do harm any more than owning a weapon causes the desire to do harm. Your ideas are outright childish at best, leftist at worst.
I'm oscillating on whether or not you're being willfully obtuse or are genuinely stupid.
The only rule is power. Letting a group develop a point where it is no longer costly for them to harm society at large has without exception ended in that civilizations collapse.
Without exception.
I'm leaning towards stupid, since you're unable to understand fine distinctions.
Weapon inequality is a threat to civilization.
Faggot.
So proliferating something isn't relevant then?
Almost like the means by which someone does harm, be it weapons, money, etc, aren't relevant. The wicked desire to do harm is.
"Muh wealth inequality" is the biggest damn red herring in existence.
It's difficult for me to believe that you're this retarded.
Concentrated power is prima facia anti-civilization. There are no societies that survive with an exacerbated power imbalance.
Wealth inequality CAUSES the desire to do harm you half wit.
How so?
Tribalism is law. Haves and have not WILL tribalize given enough distinction.
So long as the lines are sufficiently blurred peace is possible.
Once you create a group that is distinct from, has power over, and is not beholden to another group, they WILL exercise power. That's humanity.
You're hilarious. There are no societies that have ever existed without an unbalanced distribution of power. That's how societies get created to begin with.
And secondly, no, being well off does not cause the desire to do harm any more than owning a weapon causes the desire to do harm. Your ideas are outright childish at best, leftist at worst.
I'm oscillating on whether or not you're being willfully obtuse or are genuinely stupid.
The only rule is power. Letting a group develop a point where it is no longer costly for them to harm society at large has without exception ended in that civilizations collapse.
Without exception.
I'm leaning towards stupid, since you're unable to understand fine distinctions.