Well, Antifaggots are, unsusprisingly, faggots. Also, the supposedly 31 year old woman is clearly a 50+ year old man. But the cops here are fucking gay too:
Female cop lmao
Ooooh nooooo they were doing 43 in a 30 zone, I'm sure there were at six gorrilion dead children
4 kids in the backseat with only 3 seatbelts?!?!?!?! I'd comment on this but I've apparently been dead since about 2001 when we managed to fit 11 people including myself into a Lada that was only held together by the antirust paint sloppily applied over the absolutely rotten body
It's good to pull people over a lot for petty traffic offenses because 1) you catch lots of guys like this before they go on to commit more crimes and 2) constant psychotic traffic law enforcement is the only thing keeping US roads from looking like Calcutta.
Alternatively, have more stringent testing for driver's licenses with the govt. (ideally, an independent town) having the balls to tell people that no, they don't have a right to regress towards the lowest common denominator.
Pass a law: Anyone who gains a driver's license, the agent who approved the license is co-liable for any vehicular crimes the license-holder does for... 5 years, let's say, unless they can prove in court that their evaluation was strict and honest.
Most illegal driving is willful not incompetence. They're just testing competency not giving the testees a psych evaluation. And there should be constant checks that their evaluations and strict and fair, not just after a crime has been committed.
I don't see the value of putting examiners through the ringer for the misfortune of examining someone who later turns out to be a criminal psycho.
Well, Antifaggots are, unsusprisingly, faggots. Also, the supposedly 31 year old woman is clearly a 50+ year old man. But the cops here are fucking gay too:
What amazing use of police resources.
Stop making me sympathize with degenerates.
It's good to pull people over a lot for petty traffic offenses because 1) you catch lots of guys like this before they go on to commit more crimes and 2) constant psychotic traffic law enforcement is the only thing keeping US roads from looking like Calcutta.
Alternatively, have more stringent testing for driver's licenses with the govt. (ideally, an independent town) having the balls to tell people that no, they don't have a right to regress towards the lowest common denominator.
Pass a law: Anyone who gains a driver's license, the agent who approved the license is co-liable for any vehicular crimes the license-holder does for... 5 years, let's say, unless they can prove in court that their evaluation was strict and honest.
Most illegal driving is willful not incompetence. They're just testing competency not giving the testees a psych evaluation. And there should be constant checks that their evaluations and strict and fair, not just after a crime has been committed.
I don't see the value of putting examiners through the ringer for the misfortune of examining someone who later turns out to be a criminal psycho.