So basically they suspect this dude from 110 years ago didn't make accurate recordings, based on the fact it makes no sense for him to have recorded such wildly differing temperatures when cross-checked with the recorded temperatures in the nearby surrounding area back then and the decades since then. discredits the climate cult's beliefs.
They literally explain why it's not physically possible for the old recordings taken by this guy to be accurate.
Yes, I'm sure they all just missed this supposedly blatant flaw for 110 years and it's just a coincidence that it was being used to discredit climate catastrophism, which coincidentally is associated with a corrupt field of science which has been shown to manipulate data that tends to disprove its climate catastrophism.
They never say where these "closest surrounding stations" are. Are they also in Death Valley? Or are they outside of Death Valley? These pricks complaining about "Denton may have ignored standard procedures" fail to provide basic, specific, factual information to substantiate their claims. Why should anyone take them seriously?
FTFY
Yes, I'm sure they all just missed this supposedly blatant flaw for 110 years and it's just a coincidence that it was being used to discredit climate catastrophism, which coincidentally is associated with a corrupt field of science which has been shown to manipulate data that tends to disprove its climate catastrophism.
it's only impossible in that it doesn't match their flawed climate models.
it's death valley... it regularly has much higher temperatures than the surrounding areas.
Their entire worldview isn't physically possible so who gives a shit?
They never say where these "closest surrounding stations" are. Are they also in Death Valley? Or are they outside of Death Valley? These pricks complaining about "Denton may have ignored standard procedures" fail to provide basic, specific, factual information to substantiate their claims. Why should anyone take them seriously?
Are you gay? You sound gay.