Basically, a test to see if someone only knows conformist ideas or if they're capable of seeing alternative perspectives?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (93)
sorted by:
Put them in a D&D session and see how adaptive they are by how many veins are showing on the DMs forehead everytime its their turn.
You're on the right track with D&D. Basically you need to check their creativity in building or resolving hypothetical situations that go against their assumptions. One reason wokists can't write good fiction is they are incapable of escaping their own experiences.
Has anyone actually in a wheelchair opted to roll (heh) the battle wheelchair?
Those NEVER made any sense to me on any level; firstly magic and healing potions exist within the d and d universe; secondly who the fuck enforces accessibility rules on, say, a black dragon?
I chose a black dragon a they are known to be capricious and psychotic even by dragon standards
It's the same with the tranny in BG remake expansion (siege of draognspear). Even if you know nowthing about DnD, the original game (that you just remade) has a belt of femininity/masculinity as a cursed item. An item that changes your sex.
Magic that changes your sex. It is the dream come true for any tranny. No HRT, no surgery, just equip the belt and you are what you want to be at 100%.
But for whatever reason that is not something that the tranny sought out (hey, it's a cursed item and other people are happy if they can hand it over to a willing recipient).
Those people (and it also applies to the wheelchair) just want to push their agenda and want to talk about it in a game setting. That the game has already solved their issue (by having magic) and a perfect solution for people like them exist? Nope, not enough.
I think it's basically a purity check, or otherwise an attempt to make you bend the knee and submit to stupidity in the name of accessability.