It would take about 1 week of "shoot on sight" as a border policy before the problem magically disappeared and "shoot on sight" wasn't even necessary any more.
Considering how many of them still pay coyotes to cross over despite everyone knowing what those guys do, I think you are vastly overestimating their intelligence and survival instincts.
They do that because the risk of getting raped and/or possibly murdered is worth the likely reward of getting free shit forever in the US.
"shoot on sight" would also obviously include "no more free shit for anybody but Americans (and also far less free shit for them as well)", which would change that risk/reward calculus, even for the morons.
It would take about 1 week of "shoot on sight" as a border policy before the problem magically disappeared and "shoot on sight" wasn't even necessary any more.
The fact that no one has campaigned on this or proposed it as policy is nothing short of treasonous.
Considering how many of them still pay coyotes to cross over despite everyone knowing what those guys do, I think you are vastly overestimating their intelligence and survival instincts.
They do that because the risk of getting raped and/or possibly murdered is worth the likely reward of getting free shit forever in the US.
"shoot on sight" would also obviously include "no more free shit for anybody but Americans (and also far less free shit for them as well)", which would change that risk/reward calculus, even for the morons.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: Comment is not advocating the policy, just pointing out what would happen.