Like the war on drugs, the war on terror, the war on racism etc it always has the opposite result.
The governments are useless doing anything but getting more to line their individual pockets, environmental interests should be more focused on land management and have more powers for land owners like farmers so that they can properly maintain their land without red tape.
I'd add a slight correction to that, less power of the LAW ABIDING people
Criminals who don't care get more room to operate since the government is so focused on 1984'ing their population that they can't monitor those operating outside the law.
Of course this is also helping the government and agencies make money through those criminals but if it ever clicks in people's heads the way to have more power is to be less law abiding then this house of cards is gonna fall quickly.
Trying to rationalize with the “environmentally conscious” is itself a waste of resources. I made a college student error 404 after ranting about green energy simply by asking what uses more petroleum and oil derived products, “green energy” or nuclear.
By this point, the purpose of this all seems to be to enable an upper class that is determined to return to feudalism; determined that anybody not of the upper classes should, if they don't already know their place, have it forcefully pointed out to them by preventing travel; prohibiting meat; monitoring everything that's said online under the guise of preventing hate speech.
Given how big a fad transhumanism is amongst our fabulously wealthy "betters", I have a question: Do these people believe that they deserve to be a different species, one which will reduce mere homo sapiens to cattle?
Karl Marx spoke lovingly over the Guild system in the Communist Manifesto. I'm not surprised that Fabian Socialists are attempting to construct a new one.
That dumb fuck Thomas Edison already tried this shit and was proven wrong. But who am I kidding, leftist and climate cultists don't have credible education or life skills.
Like the war on drugs, the war on terror, the war on racism etc it always has the opposite result.
The governments are useless doing anything but getting more to line their individual pockets, environmental interests should be more focused on land management and have more powers for land owners like farmers so that they can properly maintain their land without red tape.
Not the opposite result...but a common repeating result; more control to the government, less power of the people.
It's never about the issue, it's always about seizing power.
I'd add a slight correction to that, less power of the LAW ABIDING people
Criminals who don't care get more room to operate since the government is so focused on 1984'ing their population that they can't monitor those operating outside the law.
Of course this is also helping the government and agencies make money through those criminals but if it ever clicks in people's heads the way to have more power is to be less law abiding then this house of cards is gonna fall quickly.
They're just following the bolshevik proverb.
The "issue" is never the issue. The real issue is always revolution.
Trying to rationalize with the “environmentally conscious” is itself a waste of resources. I made a college student error 404 after ranting about green energy simply by asking what uses more petroleum and oil derived products, “green energy” or nuclear.
By this point, the purpose of this all seems to be to enable an upper class that is determined to return to feudalism; determined that anybody not of the upper classes should, if they don't already know their place, have it forcefully pointed out to them by preventing travel; prohibiting meat; monitoring everything that's said online under the guise of preventing hate speech.
Given how big a fad transhumanism is amongst our fabulously wealthy "betters", I have a question: Do these people believe that they deserve to be a different species, one which will reduce mere homo sapiens to cattle?
Karl Marx spoke lovingly over the Guild system in the Communist Manifesto. I'm not surprised that Fabian Socialists are attempting to construct a new one.
That dumb fuck Thomas Edison already tried this shit and was proven wrong. But who am I kidding, leftist and climate cultists don't have credible education or life skills.
Batteries are not, and can never be, a source of energy... because they are a store of energy.
You have to make the energy to store it.
Does no one math?